Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10628 (5.40 seconds)

K. Anbazhagan And Etc. vs The Registrar General High Court Of ... on 13 August, 2018

appointments   of   appellants   were   appointment   on   'pensionable establishment'   or   not.   The   expression   'pensionable establishment' is not defined under the 1978 Rules ... pensionable establishment shall be counted   for   retirement   benefits   along   with   regular service   under   pensionable   establishment   subject   to the following conditions:­ (i) Service under non­pensionable
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Dr. Madan Gopal Pandey And Others vs State Of U.P.And Others on 16 August, 2018

shall qualify except-- (i) periods of temporary or officiating service in non- pensionable establishment; (ii) periods of service in work charged establishment; and (iii) periods ... permanent service in a pensionable establishment or between periods of temporary service and permanent service in a pensionable establishment, it will not constitute an interruption
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 13 - M Misra - Full Document

State Of U.P.Throu.Prin.Secy.Excise ... vs Shri Awadhesh Kumar Singh And Another on 14 February, 2020

permanent service in a pensionable establishment or between periods of temporary service and permanent service in a pensionable establishment, it will not constitute an interruption ... non pensionable service, in case, a person has rendered such service in a given between period of two temporary appointments in the pensionable establishment
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

V.Ramar vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 9 April, 2014

count half of the service rendered under non-pensionable establishment along with service under pensionable establishment for pensionary benefits. They accordingly direct that half ... service under non-pensionable establishment should have been continuous and followed by absorption in pensionable establishment without a break." 17. A perusal
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 10 - K R Baabu - Full Document

Shri Rama Shankar Pandey (Seenchpal) vs State Of U.P. And Others on 31 July, 2013

otherwise. Furthermore, there exists a distinction between a pensionable and non- pensionable establishment. Shri Krishan being a member of a non- pensionable establishment, Family Pension ... defect in making a distinction between the service rendered in pensionable and non-pensionable establishment. In any case, pensionary benefits are applicable
Allahabad High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 3 - S Agarwal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next