Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.54 seconds)

Satyajit Roy vs Eastern Railway on 21 May, 2018

further submitted that they have obtained certain information on - allotment of normalised marks which was never disclosed in the Employment Notification and that there ... aptitude test is 8 0.3. 350.699.2014, 70:30. Thus the normalised marks obtained by a candidate in the written examination are converted
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Eastern Railway vs Bikash Mitra on 22 February, 2019

Moumita Ghosh who was selected against her 3rd preference got lesser marks than the applicant. The RT1 information furnished on 27.11.2015 reveals that applicant bearing ... 35010Q0}9I20)S •/7 3 L/ 102.? 2 as normalised marks in the 2n^ stage written examination of CEN-03/20t2. The total number vacancy
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bikash Mitra vs Eastern Railway on 19 September, 2018

basis of merit and performance. Since the applicant scored higher marks he was considered and selected for actual vacancy for the post of Goods Guard ... reveals that applicant bearing RoIl No.5071722 (UR) obtained 102.12 as normalised marks in the 2nd stage written examination of CEN-0312012. The total number
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hansraj Meena vs Eastern Railway on 31 January, 2022

applicant would submit that the law with regard. to normalization (in awarding marks of candidates appearing on various venues/sessions with different sets of question ... cases, particularly, with reference ' to the underlined conditions 'that such normalisation can be resorted to when there was an established difference
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1