session, two candidates, Arun Kumar and Samir Baishya with aggregate normalised marks of 218 and 216,61 at Serial Nos. 17 and 18 respectively ... Doley at Serial No: 34 of the merit list with aggregate normalised marks of 195 in Physics, Chemistry and Biology and the quota of seats
struck down the
criteria of normalisation, but he has observed
that normalisation should be only in the
marks of the minimum qualifying examination ... many marks proportionately would be out of 800 and then normalise marks of that candidate so that both can be compared. What the University
another candidate of University 'X' (in all subjects) = 65%
Normalised marks of another candidate
= 65/90 x 100= 72.22%
The highest aggregate marks ... another candidate of University 'Y' (in all subjects) = 60%
Normalised marks of another candidate
= 60/80 x 100= 75%
As a matter
normalisation of marks can be done by considering the highest marks secured by students in each subject. Even if there is normalisation of marks across ... Regarding normalisation, different examinations conducted by different authorities have adopted different types of normalisation mechanism. The provision of normalisation of marks is enshrined in Section
percentile" formula
has been evolved to standardise or normalise the marks obtained
by the student from different Boards. In the opinion of the State ... State
government could not have introduced the percentile formula for
normalisation of the marks secured by the students passing 10th
standard examination from different Boards
avoid discrimination, it would be necessary to have a procedure for normalisation of marks with reference to a specified norm. In the instant case ... effect of distorting real merit. In the circumstances, I direct that normalisation of marks shall in future be done only in respect of the qualifying
illegal
and without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the
"Normalised Marks" merit list of and direct the
Respondents to re-evaluate and publish ... each carrying a maximum of 25 marks (aggregating to 75
marks). Also, the marking pattern over the performance spectrum in
the case of men candidates
were on
margin line, consequently on the basis of these equated
normalised marks they couldn't qualify for PST/PMT. Aggrieved
of this result ... about incorporating the
normalisation in further stages of the recruitment process, the
first suggestion was to use the same normalised score marks for
all stages
would obtain mark above the cut off marks of their respective category if option (C) would be taken as correct. In paragraph ... reproduced below :
Sl. N.
Registration No.
Roll No.
Candidate Name
Category
Normalised marks
Category Cut-Off
Status of marks if Option C is treated
secure higher marks and as such, treating all the candidates at par is discriminatory, arbitrary and irrational.
ii The normalisaton of marks is defective ... same year, if examination is held in two shifts, normalisation of marks is applicable. In the case on hand, normalisation of marks be made applicable