direct the respondents to disclose the process
and manner in which normalisation of marks
has been carried out between the candidates
who had appeared ... Court may be pleased to declare
the process of merging and normalisation of
marks adopted by the respondent as arbitrary
illegal and void
were on
margin line, consequently on the basis of these equated
normalised marks they couldn't qualify for PST/PMT. Aggrieved
of this result ... about incorporating the
normalisation in further stages of the recruitment process, the
first suggestion was to use the same normalised score marks for
all stages
The Union Of India vs Parvathy S. Shaji on 13 April, 2023
Author: S. V
cases of strict
marking, the courts could always examine and moderate/normalise the
marks. He also referred to the decision in Mahinder Kumar ... submitted that the
court/examining authority had the inherent power to normalise the
marks. He submitted that this power was implicit in the power
would obtain mark above the cut off marks of their respective category if option (C) would be taken as correct. In paragraph ... reproduced below :
Sl. N.
Registration No.
Roll No.
Candidate Name
Category
Normalised marks
Category Cut-Off
Status of marks if Option C is treated
that the petitioner was successful in the examination as he got 50% marks, but the Board did not release the score card.
It is further ... filed a document as Annexure No.13 to indicate that the normalised marks of the petitioner is 279.1363120.
It is in this context, the petitioner
based normalisation (Annexure A-6). The respondents
published the result/scorecard of the applicant on its
website, on 27.12.2022, which shows that normalised
marks awarded ... Chandigarh jurisdiction for Computer Based Test on
18.09.2022 and earned normalised marks 13.49630
(Annexure A-7) On the basis of marks earned and terms
thereafter, since the cut-off
marks for the PH candidates were 42.84 and he had
secured only 41.24 marks(Normalised), therefore, he was
not finally ... concluded in 2014. Further, as
per the respondents, the cut-off marks for empanelment
of UR candidates in non-PH category were 64.46(42.97%)
whereas
medical category has secured
73.69%(normalized) marks in the written examination. Thus, the
applicant has secured less marks in comparison to last selected
candidate under ... alongwith the applicant in the required medical
category has secured 73.69% (normalised) marks in the written
test and applicant has secured 70.63% (normalised) marks,
therefore
petitioners. No steps have been placed by the Board to
normalise the marks obtained by the different candidates who had appeared in
different sessions with
