also deleted.
4. Thereafter, a process of normalisation of the marks was
undertaken by giving pro-rata marks to all the candidates. The result ... decision of the Board to delete the questions
and normalisation of the marks.
6. These OAs were allowed by the learned Tribunal.
7. By order
award
of marks while persons in the accounts stream would be guided by a different set
of award of marks and both cannot ... correlated with each other nor could any
normalisation or standardisation be adopted for standardising their marks.
Therefore, giving weightage for the marks obtained
award
of marks while persons in the accounts stream would be guided by a different set
of award of marks and both cannot ... correlated with each other nor could any
normalisation or standardisation be adopted for standardising their marks.
Therefore, giving weightage for the marks obtained
setting out the
Petitioner's marks under the different heads and comparing them with the
marks of the last selected candidates.
10. That document ... chart shows that the Petitioner secured interview marks of 18
out of 20, yielding a normalised interview score of 9, in both backdated
years. That
award of marks while persons in the accounts stream would be guided by a
different set of award of marks and both cannot ... correlated with each other
nor could any normalisation or standardisation be adopted for standardising
their marks. Therefore, giving weightage for the marks obtained
Your marks in the SSC CGL, 2024 Tier-I examination are as follows:
English: 47.5
QA: 4 GA:
7 GIR: 37
Total: 95.5
Normalised ... Your marks in the SSC CGL, 2024 Tier-I examination are as follows:
English: 47.5
QA: 4
GA: 7
GIR: 37
Total: 95.5
Normalised
erroneously changed his normalised score from 64.7 to
56.49474 and re-process the Applicant's result based on
his normalised score released after ... Respondents to restore the Applicant's
normalized score of 64.7 marks and issue a revised
scorecard on that basis;
c) direct the Respondents
Salil Maheshwari v. High
Court of Delhi4.
ii. The Respondents arbitrarily applied normalisation to twenty-
two (22) questions without justification or adherence to the
methodology ... resulting in an undue dilution of merit.
iii. The grant of equal marks to all candidates for invalid questions
is also assailed as unfair
bidder
Both the Technical Bid mark & Price Bid mark will be added to
arrive at the total mark as follows ... bidder
FN = Normalized financial score of the bidder
The total mark will be arranged in descending order. The Highest
scorer (H1) will be declared
candidates in order to arrive at uniformity of the marks secured by the
candidates appearing in 54 shifts; that the respondents have issued the notice ... candidates were made aware of the selection process on the basis of
normalisation of scores even before appearing for the examination.
6. It is further
