required to answer queries which are
interrogatory in nature.
ii. No audit objections on NPS matter pertaining to the period
required under the Act to answer queries which are interrogatory in
nature or furnish opinion or interpretation or solve the problems raised by the
applicant ... information sought for by the
Appellant is beyond comprehension.
The Appellant objected to the observation of the Commission but at the same
time failed
published in the newspapers on 03.03.2009 informing the
claimants who have filed objections to inspect records with the office of the
Official Liquidator, Allahabad.
Observations ... asked for was
as per the RTI Act and no information was interrogatory in nature.
2
The Commission finds the submissions and the reply
company, M/s Hemisphere Properties India Limited (HPIL). He
referred to certain objections raised by M/s Tata Communications Limited
(TCL) before the National Company ... agreed to intimate the factual position
in the matter including clarification on objections before the NCLT to the
appellant, within 15 days from the date
Shri Amin Merchant vs Department Of Revenue (Tax Research ... on 18 May, 2009
CENTRAL INFORMATION
Mrs Venkatachalam vs State Bank Of India on 27 July, 2016
Central Information Commission
Room
Ajit Kumar Roy vs Inland Waterways Authority Of India, ... on 30 October, 2017
Central Information
Mr.Veer Sain vs Reserve Bank Of India on 15 December, 2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Dipak Ranjan Mukherjee vs Ministry Of Commerce & Industry on 1 November, 2024
के ीय
Mr.Ss Vohra vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India ... on 27 September, 2010
CENTRAL