said obstruction application
was dismissed after contest on 12.01.2007. Hence, the present suit is not
maintainable, in view of the bar under Order 21 Rule ... delivery application was pending, the present plaintiff has filed an
obstruction application in E.A.No.60 of 2005 which was dismissed on
12.01.2007. Where
persons, who were
alleged to be in possession, had filed obstruction application.
DH also filed his reply ... further appears that detailed obstruction application
was filed by the persons claiming to be in possession (Exh.31)
on 8.7.2011 followed by similar applications
heavy and
irreparable loss. Under these circumstances, the obstruction petitioner has filed
a claim application for adjudication.
6.The learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai ... application
to the Court complaining of such resistance or obstruction.
[(2) Where any application is made under sub-rule
heavy and
irreparable loss. Under these circumstances, the obstruction petitioner has filed
a claim application for adjudication.
6.The learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai ... application
to the Court complaining of such resistance or obstruction.
[(2) Where any application is made under sub-rule
sale deed when the 2nd and 3rd
defendants filed an application as obstructers in
Ex.No.25164/08. It is also stated that the plaintiff ... these purchasers defendants 2
and 3 have even filed obstruction application in the execution
petition etc. Even in the present suit, these defendants
obstruction is being made only at the instigation of the judgment debtors. The Rent Controller had considered all the aspects and rejected the application ... that the Rent Controller should have numbered the application before disposing any order in the application. The learned counsel submitted that the order passed
Lower Appellate Court is a non-speaking,
10
non-judicious and non-application of mind without
considering the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme ... alleged
interference and obstruction by the defendants and
accordingly, dismissed the suit.
13. The Lower Appellate Court while considering
the application under Order 41 Rule
order dated 22nd September, 1989 in that application (Ex.5) filed by
the Pawars in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 248 of 1989. The learned
District ... passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner in Application No.15 of 1988
and Application No.14 of 1989 prayed for an injunction against
empowers such a person to file an
application to the Court complaining of such resistance or
obstruction and requires the Court under sub-rule ... empower such a person to file an application to
the court complaining of such resistance or obstruction and requires
the Court under sub-rule
moved an
application for interim injunction restraining her from entering
matrimonial home till disposal of the divorce petition. In that application,
respondent ... family
members were obstructing appellant's entry to the suit flat, the
appellant filed Interim Application No.47 of 2012 in the said Divorce
