Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1505 (1.16 seconds)

Roop Lal vs State on 13 April, 1972

given either by the Government ser vant to the appointing authority, or by the appointing authority to the Govern ment servant. (b) The period ... appointment order, the appointment was liable to termination by a month's notice given by either side. The appointing authority, however, reserved the right
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Chaman Lal vs State Of H.P. & Others on 23 April, 2015

filed. The right to file reply stands closed. 2. Petitioner was offered appointment vide office order dated 23.11.2013, Annexure P-1. He has also entered ... College, Barsar. The services of the petitioner could only be . terminated by appointing authority not by the Principal. 3. Consequently, Annexure P-10 is quashed
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next