with internal injury or associated
with other disease. As there was pace maker, that means his
cardiac status was not normal. He further stated that ... Laxman
was in his hospital and in spite of the pace maker, his cardiac
status was very good. This opinion of the expert
with internal injury or associated
with other disease. As there was pace maker, that means his
cardiac status was not normal. He further stated that ... Laxman
was in his hospital and in spite of the pace maker, his cardiac
status was very good. This opinion of the expert
with internal injury or associated
with other disease. As there was pace maker, that means his
cardiac status was not normal. He further stated that ... Laxman
was in his hospital and in spite of the pace maker, his cardiac
status was very good. This opinion of the expert
with internal injury or associated
with other disease. As there was pace maker, that means his
cardiac status was not normal. He further stated that ... Laxman
was in his hospital and in spite of the pace maker, his cardiac
status was very good. This opinion of the expert
learned counsel for the
petitioner underwent surgery of implanting of pace-
maker on 26th May, 2018 and thereafter, the learned
counsel having been advised complete
Petitioner
therein was denied only on the ground that Pace-maker implantation is
not undertaken in emergency situation. In that case, a specific certificate
Vashi, Navi Mumbai. It is stated that an AICD device with
Pace Maker is also required to be implanted in the heart of
the applicant
attend the matter on account of his operation of
fixing the pace maker, the matter remained unattended at
the relevant time and the objections could
attend the matter on account of his operation of
fixing the pace maker, the matter remained unattended at
the relevant time and the objections could
Govindrao Shankarrao vs The Ganesh Co-Operative Bank, Through ... on 4 March, 2026
Author: M
