Smt. Bina Saxena vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 26 June, 2023
Petitioner
therein was denied only on the ground that Pace-maker implantation is
not undertaken in emergency situation. In that case, a specific certificate
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 158 (0.57 seconds)R.K. Bordia vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 13 May, 1988
deseases:
(i) Kidney transplantation
(ii) Cardio Vascular Surgery including/providing a Pace-maker of heart;
(iii) Cancer Surgery including brain tumor;
(iv) Body Scanner
Khushi Mandal vs Ms Central Coalfields Limited Through ... on 20 January, 2017
suffering from
Cataract and had undergone heart surgery for fixing Pace Maker at
Gandhi Nagar Hospital, Ranchi where he is still under treatment but till
S.K. Sharma vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 23 May, 2002
without seeking prior approval got his wife admitted for implementation of pace maker which was done on 7.7.97. Soon thereafter the petitioner also underwent
Jamila And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 June, 2001
disease and was treated in Govt. Hospital at Jaipur and the pace maker was installed. The petitioner was refunded the amount
Dr. K.C. Bishnoi vs Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana ... on 24 July, 2013
condition of the wife of the petitioner after
necessary tests, Pace Maker was implanted. She was
admitted on 20.06.2011 and was discharged on 21.06.2011.
Kanchan
Mariyamma C Koshy vs D/O Post on 12 October, 2018
amount of Rs.1,91,392/- for
implantation of permanent Pace Maker which was rejected by the concerned
authorities. Ultimately, Tribunal had quashed the order
State Bank Of India And Others vs M. Rajaiah And Others on 1 May, 1998
Paragraph 8 : "After we attained independence the pace of industrial growth accelerated. Our Constitution makers were aware of the hardships and insecurity faced
C.Dhanamjaya vs Sri Venkateswara ... on 29 April, 2013
security.
After we attained independence the pace of industrial growth accelerated. Our
Constitution makers were aware of the hardships and insecurity faced by the
working
G.S. Shivaprakash vs Central Silk Board, Bangalore on 24 August, 1998
security.
8. After we attained independence the pace of industrial growth accelerated. Our Constitution makers were aware of the hardships and insecurity faced