amount expended by him on installation of a new pace-maker while travelling abroad, on the ground that since the Complainant had already ... pace-maker fixed at the time of taking the policy, in view of the Exclusion Clause in the Travel Guard Insurance Policy, viz., "this
appellant No.2 arranged for procurement of the permanent pace maker from a Kolkata
based firm, i.e., the Proforma respondent No.3 and asked ... lakh fifty thousand) only being the price of the permanent pace
maker. The Appellant No.2 made an assurance that the deceased patient would survive
medical equipment, being-
(a) D.C.Defibrillators for internal use and pace makers
(b) Haemodialysors
(c) Heart Lung Machine
(d) Cobalt Therapy Unit
(e) Colour
learned counsel for the
petitioner underwent surgery of implanting of pace-
maker on 26th May, 2018 and thereafter, the learned
counsel having been advised complete
about 63 years and
he is a cardiac patient having a pace maker installed on his
person. He further submits that in the instant case
about 63 years and he is a cardiac patient having a pace
maker installed on his person. He further submits that in the instant case
reimburse medical cost incurred to the
petitioner for implantation of Pace-Maker.
The respondents have primarily stated that since the
petitioner retired ... during his service period, the petitioner
was permitted to get the pace-maker implanted at Delhi and in
pursuance thereof an advance amount
amount of Rs.1,91,392/- for
implantation of permanent Pace Maker which was rejected by the concerned
authorities. Ultimately, Tribunal had quashed the order
stated, assessee is a company in the
business of trading in pace makers, stents and other life
saving appliances. It declared income
wife, which occurred on 13.06.2016, by which time, the pace maker could not be implanted. Had the said CRT-D (pacemaker) which was removed
