placing large extents of land in Yerranagavari Palle village and in paimash Nos. 120 to 139 of Penubalakala hamlet in Chittoor District in the Prohibitory ... respect of the forest areas of Yerranagavaripalle village and those covered by paimash Nos. 120 to 139 of Penubalakala hamlet. The government directed that
writ petitions is house plots covered by Patta
No.130, Paimash No.10, Survey No.242 of Tiruchanur Village
Accounts, Tirupathi Revenue Division, Chittoor District ... part)
and 157 (part) covered by Patta No.30 located in Paimash No.10
(Survey No.242) of Tiruchanur Village Accounts presented by
petitioners
poramboke in
survey and settlements register after the survey. The
correlation of paimash No.14 to Survey No.2 was correct, but
the Settlement Officer ... basis of the oral evidence of the
claimant correlated to paimash Nos.25, 26, 27 and 28 to
Survey No.2 without personal inspection
plaintiff's grandfather. The suit survey numbers have been correlated to Paimash No. 58 part and since then the plaintiffs father has been ... admeasuring Ac. 4-18 cents forms part of the land in Paimash No. 57, admeasuring Ac. 40-00. According to the contention of the defendants
Madras Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, stated that the land covered by paimash No. 396/1 to 396/2 is covered by patta
Village: Allipur village extension Estate: Allipur
2.(a) Survey number of Paimash:T.S.No.1/1 Block No. 1 Number.
(b) What
given to the respondents to delete 147 acres of land situate in Paimash Nos.171, 172, 174 and 175 of Chittoor District.
With the above
that the Court below ought to have seen that
having held that Paimash mentioned in Ex.A10-Settlement
adangal is no tallying with survey
respondents is as under: The Plaint Scheduled land is covered by original paimash No. 389 and the same was assigned to these Plaintiffs ... cents in Sy. No. 297 which corresponds to paimash No. 389-A and by erasing 'A' in 389-A they fraudulently obtained patta
