observations in Karumbavira Vanniar (Supra);
This position is made clear from the paimash accounts
and the subsequent surveys. Mala Thattimal, which till 1919
formed part ... covered as we said an
extent of 26-21 acres. In the Paimash accounts of the year
1829 the area was designated
acres at Adampakkam Village at old Survey, which
was known as Paimash No. 722/4. The factum of ownership of
the respondent ... decreed in their favour in
respect of 1.80 acres land at Paimash No. 722/4 and which
decree had attained finality by dismissal of special
observations in Karumbavira Vanniar (Supra);
This position is made clear from the paimash accounts and the subsequent surveys. Mala Thattimal, which till 1919 formed part ... covered as we said an extent of 26-21 acres. In the Paimash accounts of the year 1829 the area was designated
delivery of possession. The suit land was
agricultural land comprised in Paimash No.199, measuring 0-4-0 Cawny,
Paimash No.200, measuring ... Cawny Paimash No.201, measuring 0-5-4
Cawny, Paimash No.273, measuring 0-4-0 Cawny, Paimash No.281, measuring
0-4-0 Cawny
issue of a patta,
failed to ascertain the extent of Paimash Nos. 520/1 and 520/3 and also to
ascertain how there has been ... note that there is clear evidence to show
the extent of Paimash Nos. 520/1 and 520/3. the extent of Paimash
following entry is found:
Pongaliamman poosari Kuppaiyandi Muthuveeran
as per paimash entry. For fields Nos. 595 and
597 no poosari's name is mentioned
behalf of the appellant, viz., A-128, A-129 and the
Paimash account dated August 25, 1830, Ex. A-147 and the
Land Register ... revival of any anterior right.
The same reasoning applies to the Paimash account dated
August 25, 1830, Ex. A-147 which
765
cannot, therefore
sale of 50
acres in patta No.61 and paimash No.987/1 of the Land.
3. It is the claim of the Appellant that
Vembanur Village,
Kadapakkam Firka, (patta No. 491), Old Paimash No.
201/8 renumbered as S. No 399/4, Acs. 1.08
(hereinafter referred
