delivery of possession. The suit land was
agricultural land comprised in Paimash No.199, measuring 0-4-0 Cawny,
Paimash No.200, measuring ... Cawny Paimash No.201, measuring 0-5-4
Cawny, Paimash No.273, measuring 0-4-0 Cawny, Paimash No.281, measuring
0-4-0 Cawny
case that 120 grounds of the Mambalam property were covered by Paimash No. 611. Eighteen grounds equal one acre. The second respondent ... himself by pretending that the lands did not fall within the Paimash No. 611 but within Paimash Nos. 606 to 609. All the lands comprised
painash No. 2802 in plaint Schedule C is a clear mistake for paimash No. 2801.
15. The land claimed in Schedule E is waterspread ... doubt, and, therefore, what is claimed in Schedule E is really not paimash No. 2801 but paimash No. 2802. I find the point accordingly
over the suit property. The suit property and other properties were in Paimash
No.181 and the same was renumbered as survey ... without verifying the records in
the proper manner, purchased the property in Paimash No.61 from a person, who is
not having any right over
following entry is found:
Pongaliamman poosari Kuppaiyandi Muthuveeran
as per paimash entry. For fields Nos. 595 and
597 no poosari's name is mentioned
recognition in the records, where it would naturally occur, the paimash, land register, and diglott, Exhibits XV, XIV and XVI. There is, therefore, no reason
Village: Allipur village extension Estate: Allipur
2.(a) Survey number of Paimash:T.S.No.1/1 Block No. 1 Number.
(b) What
September, 1883, Ex. P-1, gifted the northern portion of the property paimash 315 of the extent of 17-1/2 kulis to Meenakshiammal
measuring 2 kulies was excluded from measurement and the old paimash numbers were also described therein.
43.The Commissioner and the Surveyor, after measuring
Main Road, United India Colony, Kodambakkam, Chennai, comprised in Paimash Nos.965 & 966, Survey
