purchased from one Seeni Thevar the suit property, which was paimash No. 26 subsequently correlated during the survey as Section No. 379/2. The suit ... suit property comprised in S. No. 379/2 ccrresponded to old paimash Nos. 69 (p) and 35 (p), that those paimash numbers belonged
plaintiffs is that the suit properties are Nanja lands in old Paimash Nos. 586, 557 and 558 corresponding to new Survey ... written statement that the first defendant has nothing to do with paimash No. 586 or paimash No. 557, that he had purchased the lands bearing
cents comprised in S. No. 97/1 said to correspond to Paimash No. 248/D forming item 1; 5 acres 50 cents of land comprised ... said to correspond to Paimash Nos. 221 and 365 forming item 2; and specific 13 acres 79 bents out Of 44 acres 13 cents comprised
present case. It is sufficient to refer to the paimash register of 1829 in which the temple is described as having the ekabogam miras ... forties of last century. They were all included in the paimash or survey of Tanjore which, in this case, took place in 1829, They were
others in respect of the lands and building comprised in Paimash Nos.716, 717, 718/1, 721/3, 722/2, 859 and 860 in Survey ... garment factory to the extent of 2.72 acres in Paimash No.860 in S.No.24/2 and TS.No.105 and in respect
years back. The reference to the properties by mentioning the Paimash numbers alone has been wantonly made for the purpose of staking a false claim ... Alandur Village through their corresponding Paimash numbers is nothing but a false and fraudulent claim and the said power of attorney is illegal, void
Ammal had claimed to have purchased an extent of 1.90 acres in Paimash No.165, Neelangarai Village under a sale deed dated 17.10.1962. Such ... therein. Plaintiff therein had claimed that Survey No.84/1 corresponded to Paimash No.165. Tellingly, it had been found that Survey
respect to S.No.229/1A and 230/7A and certain old paimash number connected with these.
xii) The case of the petitioners is that ... villages were surveyed as a single unit and called as Koyambedu village Paimash Nos. of Koyambedu village were given survey members
measuring to an extent of 1.10 acres, which was
corresponding to earlier paimash No.312. The said land was owned by one
V.S.Subramaniya ... above, the Revenue records were also mutated incorrectly
without tallying the corresponding paimash number.
(xiii) It is the further case of the applicant that
application for issue of patta in respect of the
property comprised in Paimash No.967C and 968D measuring 0.1.2 kani and
1.15.6 kani respectively, measuring ... said
Ramachandra Mudaliarapproached the authorities for issuance of patta in
Paimash No.967C and 968D. According to them, the said Paimash numbers
correlates to Survey
