Jayakrushna Senapati vs State Of Orissa on 29 July, 2011
evidence on record, should prove that the accused
was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. The unsoundness of mind before and after
incident would be a relevant
Search Results Page
Search Results
11 - 20 of 21 (0.37 seconds)Shashi Kant Kaushal vs Beena Kaushal on 22 March, 2011
contended by the petitioner that the respondent has suffered from
Paranoid Schizophrenia and had been taking treatment from the Department
of Psychiatry in PGI, Chandigarh ... Doctor to find out the order and degree of the alleged Paranoid
Schizophrenia. The Doctor had said he was not in a position
Miss Sandhya K.S. D/O.Kollamparambil vs M.K.Francis on 11 February, 2011
doctor
who treated her testified that she has now paranoid schizophrenia.
Therefore, the percentage of disability as 15% and the multiplier as 18
taken
Krishna Murthy vs State Of Karnataka By Ulsoor Police ... on 30 September, 2011
records the appellant. was mtffering frem "Paranoid
Sehizophrania and he has produced Ex.Dl, the letier'
w1*itien to the Superintendent of prisene ... apart {rem the faeg
:;«,é/~
that the appellant was suffering from Paranoid
Schizophrenia, no I11(}l;3lV(E has been atiribuied
Md.Naushad Alam vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2011
that petitioner remained ill for the period between
28.12.2000-20.02.2007 with paranoid schizophrenia. In
the certificate dated 21.02.2007 Dr. Singh did not
certify that petitioner
Topa Mallah @ Jhora vs State Of Jharkhand on 12 May, 2011
Seen the report.
It appears that the appellant is suffering from Paranoid
Schizophrenia and currently he is fit for discharge and trial.
In the circumstances
Nanu Kudada vs State Of Jharkhand on 16 March, 2011
2011. It appears that the appellant
is suffering from 'Paranoid Schizophrenia' and he has been advised regular
treatment and follow
Ms. Pratibha vs State on 25 April, 2011
Kumar Parti
regarding whom appointment is sought. He is suffering from
Paranoid Schizophrenia. Copy of the certificate of Dr. Dinkar
Minz, Psychiatrist is attached. Arvind ... Arvind Kumar
Parti is not suffering from alleged disease i.e. Paranoid
Schizophrenia and is usually normal and it is a known fact to
many
Elavarasan vs State Rep.By Inspector Of Police on 5 July, 2011
being psychosis: (The differential diagnosis
considered in this case are
1. Paranoid Psychosis (Schizophrenia)
2. Substance induced Psychosis (Alcohol
induced)
3. Organic Psychosis /organic mental
Ms. Neeru Bala vs State on 20 September, 2011
only.
11. In Ranjit Kumar Ghose (supra), it was held that
schizophrenia of paranoid type is not enough to make a man
lunatic. Such features