Sujata
Manohar, JJ., adjourned the case to 9.9.1997. Mr. K.
Parasaran, Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, was
directed to give his written arguments ... have also heard Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, Senior Counsel,
(Amicus Curiae).
Mr. K.Parasaran, learned Senior Counsel for the
applicant, has contended that since the applicant
Buddhi Kota Subbarao vs Mr. K. Parasaran & Ors on 13 August, 1996
Equivalent citations: JT 1996 (7), 265 1996 SCALE ... Thomas
PETITIONER:
DR. BUDDHI KOTA SUBBARAO
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
MR. K. PARASARAN & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/08/1996
BENCH:
ANAND, A.S. (J)
BENCH
assisted by Mr. Rustom B.
Hathikhanawala, for the appellant and Mr. Mohan Parasaran, learned ASG assisted by
Mr. Manish Tiwari and Others for the respondents ... Nair and Ors. 194 ITR 148
Mr. Mohan Parasaran, learned ASG appearing for the respondents, on the other
hand, submitted that the Commissioner had decided
Salve's submissions were
supplemented by Mr. K. Parasaran, Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, Mr. K.K. Venugopal and
Mr. R. Venkataramani, learned senior counsel ... Constitution, we may now turn to the submissions made
by Mr. K. Parasaran, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the
Vinayaka Missions University
challenge in
this appeal.
Three main contentions were elaborated by Mr.K.
Parasaran, the learned senior counsel appearing for the
appellant. His first contention ... Special Court.
In this context the following submission, pressed by
Mr.Parasaran, may be considered here. He argued that the High
Court in the Writ
Karnataka High Court in W.P. No. 6257 of 1981.
K.Parasaran, A.K. Ganguli, K.R.D. Karanath and S.
Sukumaran for the Appellants ... High Court and the Writ Petition was accordingly dismissed.
Mr. Parasaran,the learned Senior Counsel appearing for
the appellants in his usual fairness had indicated
High Court at the sate of show-cause notice.
Sri K. Parasaran, learned counsel for the appellant,
urged the following contentions :
(1) Section ... Nadu, disputed the correctness of the various
submissions put forward by Sri Parasaran. He supported the
reasoning and conclusion of the Madras High Court
ground which would attract the principles of estoppel.
9. Mr. Mohan Parasaran, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that when Venkataswami ... State of Bombay , for hardships.
12. Replying to those contentions Mr. Mohan Parasaran, the learned Counsel for the petitioner Trust, contends that the relief asked
Shuchi
Kakkar & Ms. Sujata, Advocates
For Respondent: ASG Sri Mohan Parasaran with Shri Gaurav
Dhingra, Advocate
CORAM: HONBLE MR. D.N. PANDA, JUDICIAL ... such a stand of appellants was demolished by learned. ASG Shri Mohan Parasaran appearing for Revenue who submitted that the writ petition was dismissed
KAUR MALIK AND ANR. v. MALIK ANUP SINGH , .
9. However, Sri K. Parasaran, learned Senior Counsel appearing along with Sri L.S. Venkatakrishna, learned Counsel ... will of late C.G. Sastry? As rightly pointed out by Sri Parasaran, prima facie the size of the paper in which it is written
