possession over the hills of Parasnath. In 1861, Captain Dalton in Survey Appeal declared that Parasnath hill should not be divided and should be included ... hill of Parasnath it caused interference with the peaceful possession and management ot'the Parasnath hill by the plaintiffs and as such they
make any construction of temple or Dharamshala etc. on the Parasnath hill and for a permanent Injunction restraining them from making any such construction ... Sect in Title Suit No. 10 of 67 is that the Parasnath hill having an area of 23 sq. miles was purchased by Seth Anandji
Raja Ran Bahadur Singh, AIR 1919 Pat 146 the title to Parasnadi hill was In dispute between two parties while the matter was pending ... other by a permanent lease, their right, title and interest in Parasnath hill to the representative of the Sitambaris. In the deed of conveyance
Swetambaris in the character
of the charans in certain shrines on Parasnath Hill were continuing wrongs within the meaning of Section 23 of the Limitation
Brajesh Kumar Bharadwaj & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 April
Rajeev Ranjan Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 April
Manoj Kumar Chaudhary & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 April
Dhananjay Kumar Yadav & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 January
Vinod Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 January, 2017
Sudhir Kumar Sarang & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 January
