Title State vs . Jug Lal Parcha on 12 September, 2013
THE COURT OF SH. SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA :
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
TIS HAZARI COURTS : DELHI ... their happening.
FIR NO. 39/2006 State v. Jug Lal Parcha Page No.12/27
The imputability arises from acting despite the consciousness.
Culpable negligence
disclosure statement
made on 08.11.2006. The witness termed it correct that Parcha 12 was issued in
respect of the addresses of accused persons mentioned
lock up of PS Dwarka
Sector 23. On 13.10.2011 parcha 12 was verified. After the completion of
investigation, he prepared the challan and filed
passed by the Circle Officer,
Daud Nagar in Basgit Parcha Case No. 12 of 2000-01 in favour of
the respondent
suit property.
Suit no. 122/13 Veena Azad Vs. Suresh Parcha 4/6
12. The plaintiff had further claimed that defendant be restrained
from creating
Parcha Bayan (Exh.P.1) of injured-Dharam Singh Meena (PW1) inter-alia stating that at 8.30-9.00 a.m. on 13/12/2002 ... succumbed to his injuries on the following day i.e. on 14/12/2002 at 8.30 a.m. In the FIR, which was registered initially
Parcha Bayan (Exh.P.1) of injured-Dharam Singh Meena (PW1) inter-alia stating that at 8.30-9.00 a.m. on 13/12/2002 ... succumbed to his injuries on the following day i.e. on 14/12/2002 at 8.30 a.m. In the FIR, which was registered initially
Parcha Bayan (Exh.P.1) of injured-Dharam Singh Meena (PW1) inter-alia stating that at 8.30-9.00 a.m. on 13/12/2002 ... succumbed to his injuries on the following day i.e. on 14/12/2002 at 8.30 a.m. In the FIR, which was registered initially
Singh
CC No.6512/A/12
12.02.2013
Present: None for the Complainant.
Accused with counsel.
This is a Parcha Yaddast as the file is before ... Super Crafts Vs. M/s Fair Growth Exports
CC No.6777/12
12.02.2013
Present: Ld. counsels for both the sides.
Both the ld. counsels submit
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
None.
Perused supplementary charge sheet. Parcha Yadasht to
the main file is directed to be annexed with supplementary sheet ... summons to all the three accused to their
sureties for 08.06.2011."
12. From the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that Trial
Court
