K.D. Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 23 December, 2014
Author: Paramjeet
land of Phase I for fixing the additional
price submitted by HSIIDC.
Tables showing the detail of land for Phase-I for enhancement purpose ... Commercial
I Comm. Towers 46.54 17.75 46.54 28.79 The area under
parking i.e. 28.79
(Sec 2)
acres around
commercial
towers included in
saleable area
file from the almirah and it having been placed on his
table by the accused, is fully established from the facts and circumstances
emerging ... accused and then he was removed in a vehicle which was lying parked
outside is not proved on record. By this evidence of the defence
Fateh Singh vs State Of Punjab on 14 November, 2014
Crl. A. No. S-2621
other respondents in the connected appeals, were meant to be
developed as parks, but due to the present litigation, the same could not be
MONIKA ... view that
the present appeal deserves to succeed. As per the table reproduced above,
which was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing
M/S Contessa Commercial Co. (P) Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs on 8 September, 2014
Ravinder Kaur & Others vs Saraj Singh & Others on 11 September, 2014
Author: Naresh
P.R.T.C. Through Its Managing Dir. , Ptl vs Reena Devi And Ors on
Amar Singh And Another vs Avtar Singh And Others on 31 March, 2014
Author: K