Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Parle Biscuit Pvt Ltd. vs Union Of India on 7 November, 2016 WP-15386-2013 ( M/S PARLE BISCUIT PVT LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA

declared weight of biscuits and the actual weight of biscuit packets in respect of Crackjack, Monaco and Nimkin biscuits were taken on the same proportion ... Parle G (23,69,802) Moanco 7,31,118 Krackjack 16,60,185 Nimkin 12,74,776 CMU's (Parle G) Annakut Biscuits

authorization given by Parle and accepted by the appellant are reproduced below: "AUTHORISATION We M/s Parle Biscuits Pvt. Lid. Vile Parle (East). Mumbai ... sheet of Parle as goods manufactured on behalf of Parle and sold and marketed by Parle. The excise duty paid on the biscuits cleared from

authorization given by Parle and accepted by the appellant are reproduced below: "AUTHORISATION We M/s Parle Biscuits Pvt. Lid. Vile Parle (East). Mumbai ... sheet of Parle as goods manufactured on behalf of Parle and sold and marketed by Parle. The excise duty paid on the biscuits cleared from

Parle Biscuits P. Ltd., Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax on 28 November, 2008 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES ... 2009 Assessment year 2005-2006 DCIT, CC.25 M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai - 020 vs. Mumbai - 57 PAN AAACP-0485-D (Appellant) (Respondent

Region having Central Licenses, after inclusion/incorporation of information of Parle Product/Parle Biscuits- license surrendered/company closure. m) Copy of "Quarterly Report ... sent to CAG, after inclusion/incorporation of the information of Parle Product/Parle Biscuits - License surrendered/company closure. n) Copies of correspondence/communication/inspections between

contract manufacturing unit engaged in manufacturing biscuits for its principal Parle Biscuits. 1. the appellant 2 E/51030/2018 3. The appellant claims that ... Parle Biscuits. The appellant also claims that it availed and utilised input services used in relation to the manufacture of biscuits for Parle Biscuits

contract manufacturing unit engaged in manufacturing biscuits for its principal Parle Biscuits. 1 . the appellant 2 E/51029/2018 3. The appellant claims that ... Parle Biscuits. The appellant also claims that it availed and utilised input services used in relation to the manufacture of biscuits for Parle Biscuits

contract manufacturing unit engaged in manufacturing biscuits for its principal Parle Biscuits. 1 . the appellant 2 E/53283/2018 3. The appellant claims that ... Parle Biscuits. The appellant also claims that it availed and utilised input services used in relation to the manufacture of biscuits for Parle Biscuits

Parle Biscuits. Krishna Food also claims that it availed and utilised input services used in relation to the manufacture of biscuits for Parle Biscuits ... procured by Parle Biscuits on payment of service tax. However, as biscuits were manufactured not only in the factories of Parle Biscuits, but also