Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Parle Products Limited vs Subir Mukherjee on 23 June, 2000 Equivalent citations: (2001)ILLJ964CAL Author: S.B. Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha JUDGMENT

Parle Products Private Limited ... vs Itc Limited And Anr on 18 May, 2023 Author: Ravi Krishan Kapur Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur ... HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE [Commercial Division] IPDTMA/24/2023 PARLE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED (OA/41/2012/TM/KOL) VS ITC LIMITED

Judge failed to note that the design, appearance, label, etc. of the products are similar and as erroneously come to the conclusion that the word ... plaintiff has referred to a judgment reported AIR 1972 SC 1359 ( Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. & Co., Mysore ) and relies particularly

protection is to reward and encourage good product design by protecting the skill, creativity and labour of product designers. Design is concerned with both form ... need not be an artistic work or possess artistic merit. In Parle Products Private Limited v. Surya Food & Agro Limited reported

protection is to reward and encourage good product design by protecting the skill, creativity and labour of product designers. Design is concerned with both form ... need not be an artistic work or possess artistic merit. In Parle Products Private Limited v. Surya Food & Agro Limited reported

liable for registration. Learned counsel has referred to advertisements and/or products using phonetically similar trademark with spelling variations and submits that these disclosures show ... Bombay High 7 Court in International Foodstuffs Co. v. Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 2038 for the proposition that

case. 27. Mr. Bhattacharyya had also relied on the decision of Parle Products. Limited v. Subir Mukherjee reported

Ambal" and "Andal". In the case of Parle Products v. J. P. & Co. Mysore the Supreme Court reiterated that in order

plaintiff relied upon the judgment reported in (1972) 1 SCC 618 (Parle Products (P) Ltd -vs- J.P. and Co., Mysore) and submitted that ... necessary. Both tests, visually and phonetic, must be applied. 19. In Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. and Co., Mysore reported

plaintiff relied upon the judgment reported in (1972) 1 SCC 618 (Parle Products (P) Ltd -vs- J.P. and Co., Mysore) and submitted that ... necessary. Both tests, visually and phonetic, must be applied. 19. In Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. and Co., Mysore reported