Judge dissented from the decision of the Madras High Court in Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 M. 175 and he distinguished those ... adopted here by Mr. S. Duraiswami Aiyar in his contention that Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 M. 175 has no application
Roberts v. Roberts (1864) 33 L.J., Q.B., 249.] In the case of Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R., 8 Mad., 175, Turner ... case of Srikant Roy v. Satcoori Shaha (1878) 3 C.L.R., 181, and the opinion expressed in Parvathi v. Mannar
Presidency Town of Bombay.
17. So, too, in Waghela Rajsanji v. Shekh Masludin ... that purpose Kashiram Krishna v. Bhadu Bapuji (1870) 7 B. H. C. R (A. C.J.), 17 ; Parvathi v. Mannar
right of action to the person damaged by such publication: See Ratcliffe v. Evans (1863) 9 Moo. I.A. 387, 426.
24. There are certain ... plaintiff, of which the most important is the case of Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 Mad. 175 in which it was held
Satish Chandra Chakravarti v. Ram Doyal De (1920) I.L.R. 48 Cal. 388 (S.B.) and Bai Shanta v. Umrao Amir ... view of the law which is essentially just and equitable cf. Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 Mad. 175 and which
Courts have set their faces against it. The decisions in Parvathi v. Mannar ... Maganatha Sastri v. Subramania Iyer (1917) 32 M.L.J. 392 were quoted in support of this position. Parvathi v. Mannar
Seethalakshmi Achi And Ors. vs V.T. Veerappa Chettiar on 3 April, 1951
Equivalent citations
cases; but this Court extended the law of slander in Parvathi v. Mannar
Mahmud J. followed the view of Turner C.J. expressed in Parvathi v. Mannar (1885) 8 Mad. 175. In that case it was held that
Simmons v. Mitchell (1880) 6 Appeal Cases, 156, a decision of the Privy Council on appeal from the Windward Islands. In Parvathi v. Mannar
