Section 19 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
under the decree of the Court; (q) suits for compensation for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, adultery or breach of promise of marriage; (r) suits
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2017 (1.06 seconds)Hindustan Unilever Limited vs Reckitt Benckiser India Limited on 31 January, 2014
Reckitt alleged that the defendant‟s advertisement is a slanderous attempt
to increase the market share of its LIFEBUOY soap by defaming and
disparaging ... test which has been well established, particularly in passing off
cases. Though slander of goods and disparaging advertisements stand
on a slightly different footing
Queen-Empress vs Taki Husain on 6 December, 1884
this was said to be so because the reasons for making slanderous imputations indictable were different under the two systems. These statements ... verbal pleas, I remark that if it were certain that a person slandered by a writing sent to him would be sure to destroy
Dabur India Limited vs Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. on 9 September, 2004
that his competitors, goods are bad. If he says so, he really slanders the goods of his competitors. In other words he defames his competitors ... also been placed on observations of Carter-Ruck on Libel and Slander in the following passages:-
"In an action for slander of goods
Miss Kamalini Manmade vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 19 November, 1965
India, at any rate to civil actions in damages for libel or slander. On the other hand, the plaintiff, who argued the matter in person ... same should not be applied to civil actions for libel or slander. In support of these rival contentions several authorities were relied upon.
7. Before
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. vs Hindustan Unilever Ltd. on 13 May, 2013
competitors' goods are bad. If he says so, he
really slanders the goods of his competitors. In
other words he defames his competitors ... falsehood the test that the Court
should apply whether in relation to slander of
goods or slander of a financial product is
whether the financial
Section 37 in The Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 [Entire Act]
restraint or confinement; (c) for malicious prosecution; (d) for libel; (e) for slander; (f) for adultery or seduction; (g) for breach of contract of betrothal ... restraint or confinement; (c) for malicious prosecution; (d) for libel; (e) for slander; (f) for adultery or seduction; (g) for breach of contract of betrothal
Hindustan Unilever Limited vs Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing ... on 16 June, 2017
present Suit is in the nature of an action for generic
disparagement/slander of goods of the product category of Dairy Based
Desserts referred ... competitors' goods
are bad. If he says so, he really slanders the goods of his
competitors. In other words he defames his competitors
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. vs Hindustan Lever Limited on 7 July, 2008
plaintiff that the defendant's said
advertisement is nothing but a slanderous attempt of the defendant to
increase the market share of its LIFEBUOY ... test which has been well established, particularly in
passing off cases. Though slander of goods and disparaging advertisements
stand on a slightly different footing
Imperial Tobacco Co. vs Albert Bonnan on 21 January, 1927
plaintiff further claims damages for what is sometimes shortly called "slander of goods," i.e. for statements false, made maliciously or without lawful ... defendant company got before trial notice of two occasions on which slander of goods was said to have been uttered. In the evidence