Judge dissented from the decision of the Madras High Court in Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 M. 175 and he distinguished those ... adopted here by Mr. S. Duraiswami Aiyar in his contention that Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 M. 175 has no application
Roberts v. Roberts (1864) 33 L.J., Q.B., 249.] In the case of Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R., 8 Mad., 175, Turner ... case of Srikant Roy v. Satcoori Shaha (1878) 3 C.L.R., 181, and the opinion expressed in Parvathi v. Mannar
Presidency Town of Bombay.
17. So, too, in Waghela Rajsanji v. Shekh Masludin ... that purpose Kashiram Krishna v. Bhadu Bapuji (1870) 7 B. H. C. R (A. C.J.), 17 ; Parvathi v. Mannar
Satish Chandra Chakravarti v. Ram Doyal De (1920) I.L.R. 48 Cal. 388 (S.B.) and Bai Shanta v. Umrao Amir ... view of the law which is essentially just and equitable cf. Parvathi v. Mannar (1884) I.L.R. 8 Mad. 175 and which
Mitter, J., and Maclean, J., in the case of Srikant Roy v. Satcori Shaha, 3 C. L. R., 181, which it followed. In the case ... more important than the ruling of the Madras High Court in Parvathi v. Mannar, I.L.R., 8 Mad., 175, where Turner
Presidency Town of Bombay.
18. So, too, in Waghela Rajsanji v. Shekh Masludin [1887] 11 Bom. 551, Lord Hobhouse, in delivering the judgment of their ... that purpose Kashiram Krishna v. Bhadu Bapuji [1870] 7 B.H.C. (A.C) 17 ; Parvathi v. Mannar [1884] 8 Mad. 175 ; Ibin Hosein v
