counsel had appeared before the learned trial
court and requested for a Passover. However, the learned Trial Court instead
of granting a Passover, closed ... petitioner was not seeking an adjournment but was
only requesting a Passover, ironically, the learned Trial Court closed the
defendant‟s evidence in haste
absurd to order the petitioner / accused to
appear at recall after passover as he had already informed on
VC that he was in Patial House ... main counsel
but directed the main counsel to appear after passover,
assuming without any basis that the main counsel could do so
but was avoiding
absurd to order the petitioner / accused to
appear at recall after passover as he had already informed on
VC that he was in Patial House ... main counsel
but directed the main counsel to appear after passover,
assuming without any basis that the main counsel could do so
but was avoiding
proxy counsel for the
complainant is apprised not to
unnecessarily seek passovers
without even being cognizant of
the reason for which he is seeking ... passover. It is made clear to the
complainant that no party has an
indefeasible right upon the time of
the court and passover
this Court on 29.01.2024 and
request was made only for a passover and not adjournment. Order sheets
would indicate that Petitioners were not solely responsible ... counsel
requested the Trial Court to passover the matters as the arguing counsel was
before this Court and the details of the case listed
this Court on 29.01.2024 and
request was made only for a passover and not adjournment. Order sheets
would indicate that Petitioners were not solely responsible ... counsel
requested the Trial Court to passover the matters as the arguing counsel was
before this Court and the details of the case listed
court and thus
the matter was passed over as was requested. The Passover was called
however, the erstwhile counsel remained occupied before this court. Thus ... plaintiff witness. Their conduct is
itself lackadaisical as they have sought Passovers on many occasions.
Moreso, on 20.09.2022, when the right to cross-examine
Vikrant Singh - Government Advocate for State.
Learned counsel for appellant prays for passover.
Today is final hearing day and it is not possible to grant ... passover
without affecting the final hearing, therefore, request for passover is rejected.
List the case after two weeks.
In the meanwhile, copy of appeal
Sahu - Advocate for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for passover.
Today is final hearing day. Passover is not admissible on final hearing ... encroaches time reserved for final hearing. Request for passover is
rejected.
Case is adjourned.
List this case after Holi vacation.
(VIVEK AGARWAL)
JUDGE
ts
Signature
first round, the same was
requested to be kept in passover by learned counsel for the appellant. In the
second round, again a request ... passover is made, which is also acceded
to. However, when the matter is again called out in the third round i.e. in
post-lunch
