appointment of
Arbitrator and the fact of the case is different than
the case of Patel Engineering Limited (supra).
Reliance is to be placed ... 2018 & 19834/2018
- 14 -
between two cases. Even if this Court considered
the case of Patel Engineering (supra) as relied
upon by the learned
appointment of Arbitrator
and the fact of the case is different than the case of
Patel Engineering Limited (supra). Reliance is to be
placed ... make
a world of difference between two cases. Even if this
Court considered the case of Patel Engineering
(supra) as relied upon by the learned
Judge Bench of the Apex Court in the case
of SBP & CO v. PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED AND
ANOTHER1. In the said case the Apex ... Patel Engg. Ltd., (2005) 8 SCC 618] stating that it will
not apply to a case of a non-appointment of an arbitrator. This
Court
Sri Ganapathy Manickam vs State Of Karnataka on 5 March, 2026
Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench
Rajkumar Chellappan Pillai vs State Of Karnataka on 4 April, 2025
Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench
judgment relied on by
the learned counsel for the respondent is PATEL ENGINEERING
LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA5 wherein it is held as follows ... distinguishable without much ado as the
judgment in the case of PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED supra
follows JESUS SALES CORPORATION. The issue in the said
cases
emphasis supplied)
17. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
MMTC Limited Vs. Vedanta Limited4 held as follows ... supplied)
18. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Patel Engineering Limited Vs. North Eastern
Electric Power Corporation Limited5 held as follows
Judgment of the Apex Court in the
6
case of SBP & CO. v. Patel Engineering Ltd. and
Another reported in 2005 (8) Supreme Court ... Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of SBP & CO. v.
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another (supra), and
having expounded on the principles
regard
relied on the following decisions:
(i) The case of SBP & Co. -vs- Patel Engineering
Ltd. and another [(2005) 8 SCC 618] wherein ... Chief Justice or his designate as held in
the case of Patel Engineering Ltd. (supra). Therefore,
until the petition under Section
identical circumstance this Court in the case of PATEL
ENGINEERING LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA1 has held as
follows:
".... .... ....
13. As observed ... unlettered. On
the said the score, permitting further investigation even, in the
case at hand, would run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court
