Prosecution Agency to furnish the unedited true certified copy of intercepted phone conversation in audio form while the transcript of the intercepted phone conversation ... passed by the trial court the entire unedited certified copy of intercepted phone conversation in audio form has already been submitted to the trial court
Sections 16 and 18 thereof.
He further submitted that the legally intercepted phone calls of the
respondents-accused Nos. 3 and 4 with the other ... terrorist activities
against the respondents, sought to rely on the legally intercepted phone calls
said to have made by accused No.3 from Phone
sought permission from
authorities concerned for intercepting petitioner's phone conversations;
that on 17.03.2023 NIA had filed a final report in trial court against ... plain chronology itself,
i.e., NIA seeking permission to intercept petitioner's phone calls on
07.03.2023 immediately after the FB post
telephone number
the period of interception are clearly given. The telegraph interception,
authorization and permission to intercept the telegraphic conversation are
during the relevant period ... that the interception of phone calls are made after
getting proper and appropriate orders from the concerned. In many number of
cases, the same have
were taken on
legal interception. On 16.09.2009, a conversation was intercepted between
mobile number 9506805141 (hereinafter referred to as "phone connection ... were irrelevant. He admitted
that "phone connection A and phone connection B" were put on interception
for the purpose of watching the movements
which the
permission was granted by the Home Secretary, allowing interception of
phones of the co-accused, in order to effectively defend the case against
organized corruption
was being committed, thereby, certain phone conversations
were intercepted. On interception of Phone on 12.02.2015 it
was found that Shiv Shankar Bhatt
submitted by the
petitioner that his Mobile No.9929429910 was kept under
interception to unveil alleged corruption.
6. Taking a dig at secret information, petitioner ... this behalf, petitioner
has alleged that ACB was simply permitted to intercept mobile
phone of Sh. Sanjay Sethi and its endeavor to intercept other
mobile
post of IG & above could straight away ask for interception of the phone from the service provider for six days and on the basis ... 2006 sought approval of Principal Secretary (HOme) for interception of cell phone numbers of Vijay Kumar Choudhary (A-12) for 60 days to prevent them
post of IG & above could straight away ask for interception of the phone from the service provider for six days and on the basis ... 2006 sought approval of Principal Secretary (HOme) for interception of cell phone numbers of Vijay Kumar Choudhary (A-12) for 60 days to prevent them
