Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Pooppally Foods on 26 September, 1985
Equivalent citations: [1986]161ITR729(KER)
JUDGMENT
K. Bhaskaran, C.J.
1. The assessee ... Pooppally Foods, Alleppey, is a registered firm, carrying on the business of export of canned and processed shrimps. For the assessment year
Esic vs Pooppally Foods on 1 August, 1984
Equivalent citations: (1985)ILLJ10KER
JUDGMENT
Paripoornan, J.
1. The Regional Director, ESI Corporation, Trichur, is the appellant
Varghese Pooppally (Cheriyan ... vs The State Of Kerala on 23 July, 2010
Author: J.Chelameswar
Bench: J.Chelameswar , P.N.Ravindran
IN THE HIGH COURT ... KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 23102 of 2010(S)
1. VARGHESE POOPPALLY (CHERIYAN P.VARGHESE)
... Petitioner
2. P.C.SIBIMON,
Vs
1. THE STATE
Pooppally Coir Mills vs State Of Kerala on 11 February, 2014
Author: A.M.Shaffique
Bench: A.M.Shaffique
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA ... 30TH ASHADHA, 1936
WP(C).No. 7739 of 2014 (N)
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------
POOPPALLY COIR MILLS,
A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
HAVING ITS OFFICE
Pooppally Coir Mills vs Agricultureal Income Tax And State Tax ... on 8 February, 2021
Author: A.M.Badar
Bench: A.M.Badar
IN THE HIGH ... 19TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.3149 OF 2021(P)
PETITIONER:
POOPPALLY COIR MILLS
AS ROAD,ALAPPUZHA-688007,(REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
PARTNER,DILIP CHERIAN
Nagar vs Pooppally Junction on 26 April, 2018
IN THE COURT OF XIV ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26th ... Paul
Amala Agro Agencies
Reptd by its Proprietor - Sri. Sura Prakash
ACCUSED Pooppally Junction, Ponga P.O. Kuttanadu,
Alappuzha - 688 512.
OFFENCE
Nagar vs Pooppally Junction on 26 April, 2018
IN THE COURT OF XIV ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26th ... Paul
Amala Agro Agencies
Reptd by its Proprietor - Sri. Sura Prakash
ACCUSED Pooppally Junction, Ponga P.O. Kuttanadu,
Alappuzha - 688 512.
OFFENCE
Tribunal following a decision of this court in CIT v. Pooppally Foods [1986] 161 ITR 729.
5. It was pointed out by learned senior standing ... further pointed out that the decision of this court in CIT v. Pooppally Foods [1986] 161 ITR 729, is no longer good
KSEB.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 2 TO 6:
------------------------------
1. ARAVINDAKSHAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN,
POOPPALLY VEEDU, CHERTHALA MUNICIPAL TOWN,
CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DIST.
2. KARTHIKEYAN ... RAGHAVAN, POOPPALLY VEEDU,
CHERTHALA MUNICIPAL TOWN,
CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DIST.
3. PARTHASARADHI, S/O.RAGHAVAN,
POOPPALLY VEEDU, CHERTHALA MUNICIPAL TOWN,
CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA
M. Amratha Kumar vs State Of Sikkim on 21 April, 2014
Author: S. P. Wangdi
