Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

since 1980 or times immemorial. The petitioners do not claim any prescriptive title or ownership to the lands in question. 4. In the circumstances above

including possession and he must also be held to have acquired title by prescription and the trial court erroneously ignored the same ... said two documents cannot be upheld. Even with regard to the prescriptive title set up by the plaintiff, Exs.A.5 to A.11 cist

long or from times immemorial. The petitioners do not claim any prescriptive title or ownership to the lands in question. 4. In the circumstances above

respondents 5 to 8 reiterate that they have acquired title to the property by adverse possession. In view of the findings recorded ... claim of the respondents 5 to 8 to have acquired prescriptive title to the schedule land has been rejected clearly and comprehensively in the judgment

since 1980 or times immemorial. The petitioners do not claim any prescriptive title or ownership to the lands in question. 4. In the circumstances above

Md.Ammanuallah Ghouri vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By ... on 22 January, 2013

Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches' ... vs Government Of A.P. And Ors. on 29 January

M. Babu Rao And Ors. vs Deputy Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 5 July, 2005

B. Archana Reddy And Ors. vs State Of A.P., Rep. By Its Secretary, Law

there appears no warrant for restricting it by reference to the title of the scheme. Even otherwise, the expression 'Retirement of Officers ... preceding the date of leave or discontinuance from service is effectuated by prescription of sanction in paragraph 5(2) that on breach of requirement