leave to defend has not been
considered on merits, relying on Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal
Singh (dead) through ... direct ratio of the Supreme Court in the case of
Prithipal Singh (supra) which says that neither the Additional Rent
Controller nor the High Court
leave to defend has not been considered on merits,
relying on Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal Singh (dead) through ... direct ratio of the Supreme Court in
the case of Prithipal Singh (supra) which says that neither the
Additional Rent Controller nor the High Court
power to condone the delay.
26. Supreme Court, in Prithipal Singh (Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal
Singh (2010) 2 SCC 15) supra also noted that
brought before a Civil
Judge; (VI) that similarly, in Prithipal Singh Vs. Magh Singh AIR 1982
Punjab 137, it was held that the suit under ... senior counsel for the petitioners / defendants has then referred to
Prithipal Singh supra of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana also relied
upon
misconceived inasmuch as
the field, since then is covered by Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal Singh ( 2010)
2 SCC 15 and by Kailash Devi Vs. Brij ... Judge who in Kailash Devi supra held that in view
of Prithipal Singh supra this Court also does not have power to extend the
time
with respect thereto
would have made the natural heirs of Sir Sobha Singh as parties to the suit. The
respondent did not choose ... collateral proceedings in which the Will may be in question. See Prithipal Singh
Sabharwal Vs. Jagjit Singh Sabharwal MANU/DE/0851/1996
expeditious but allowed.
28. The counsels to, in reference to Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal Singh
(2010) 2 SCC 15, also address whether this Court
been filed within the prescribed time.
b. In the light of Prithipal Singh vs. Satpal Singh (2010) 2 SCC
15, it was held that
grant of leave. It was further held in Kewal Singh Vs.
RC. REV. 112/2016 & RC. REV. 130/2016 Page 8 of 10
Lajwanti ... granted unless the
affidavit discloses such facts. Ultimately in Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal
Singh (2010) 2 SCC 15 it was held that the dominant object
December, 2014).
17. I may also notice that Supreme Court in Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal
Singh (2010) 2 SCC 15 has held that
