commencement of the Himachal
Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act . Plaintiffs and pro forma
defendant are the legal heirs of Chaitru. The defendant, in
connivance ... decreed on the admission made by the
landowners. The plaintiffs and pro forma defendant were not
arrayed as parties to the previous suit. The defendant
defendant no:2) and Piaru too died leaving behind the
plaintiff and the pro forma defendant no: 12. The plaintiffs have
pleaded that Ful, during ... suit is undervalued and under stamped?
(9) Whether the plaintiffs and pro forma defendants have right, title
and share in the suit property as alleged
forma Defendant No. 2 is the sister
of the Respondent/Plaintiff. The pro-forma Defendant No. 1 was the
widow of late Ashok Kumar ... last on 26/08/2010 leaving
behind him the Respondent/Plaintiff and the pro-forma Defendants
as the legal heirs and successors. After observing rituals
stated, the facts giving rise to the present
appeal are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit before the learned
rt
Trial Court seeking possession ... years at the time of his death. The plaintiff and pro
forma defendants are entitled to inherit the estate of the
deceased. Hence, the suit
Petitioners as well as learned
Addl. Standing Counsel for the pro forma-Plaintiff. Perused the
application.
4. By filing the present application under Article
Sahu, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the pro
forma-plaintiff. Perused the application.
3. By filing the present application under Article 227 of the
Constitution
company being the Defendant no. 4 is pro forma Defendant.
Plaint case in nutshell:
a) The original Plaintiff no. 1 & 2 are father ... Bhoomi"). M/s
Bhoomi is the pro-forma Defendant no. 4. The original Plaintiffs were
the directors of M/s Bhoomi and owned
company being the Defendant no. 4 is pro forma Defendant.
Plaint case in nutshell:
a) The original Plaintiff no. 1 & 2 are father ... Bhoomi"). M/s
Bhoomi is the pro-forma Defendant no. 4. The original Plaintiffs were
the directors of M/s Bhoomi and owned
company being the Defendant no. 4 is pro forma Defendant.
Plaint case in nutshell:
a) The original Plaintiff no. 1 & 2 are father ... Bhoomi"). M/s
Bhoomi is the pro-forma Defendant no. 4. The original Plaintiffs were
the directors of M/s Bhoomi and owned
premises of Gombhira Tea Garden. The
plaintiff has arrayed the Gombhira Tea Estate as pro-
forma defendant No.2, and there is no relief claimed ... possession certificate and characterises it
as fabricated. The pro-forma defendant further
asserts that the plaintiff's husband, Hangsha
Narayan Baroi, was a workers
