party or between a party against whom a relief is claimed and a party against whom no relief is claimed.
15. A 'pro forma ... Lawyers frequently use the expressions "necessary parties", "proper parties" and " 'pro forma' parties" although these expressions
Branch, District Mandi,
H.P., through its Branch Manager.
.........Respondents/Pro-forma opposite parties
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Inder Singh Mehta, President ... party
No.1/dealer has not been set aside till date.
5. The complaint has been opposed by the
opposite parties and pro-forma opposite
subsequent transferees and have been impleaded as pro forma defendants second party. China Choudhary, the common ancestor of defendants Nos. 3 to 10, is recorded ... favour of Mahendra Narain Singh, defendant No. 14 of pro forma defendants second party, in respect of 1 bigha 15 kathas forming the northern portion
ratified by all the defendants present and either contesting or formal/pro forma parties in C.S. No. 1246 of 1992. The order ... settlement. But, according to the plaintiff, they are only pro forma parties in C.S. No. 1247 of 1992, against whom no relief is sought
applicable, with other
details being as per the pro-forma charter party. In reply, AGM proposed
certain terms of carriage and amended Clause ... requested Trampline to send the full recap and the Pro-forma charter party.
Trampline, by its email of 2nd April, 2008 at 13:24 hours
Parties 6 to 11 in this case.
7. In the background of these facts, one of those seven parties, SMC Power Generation Ltd.- pro forma ... Opposite Party. Apart from that, State of Orissa is also a party. The other allottees have been arrayed as pro forma Respondents. It is also
wherein the Court has
explained the distinction between necessary party, proper
party and pro forma party and further held that if a person ... distinction between necessary party, proper party
and pro forma party and further held that if a
person who is likely to suffer from the order
wherein the Court has
explained the distinction between necessary
party, proper party and pro forma party and
further held that if a person ... wherein the Court
has explained the distinction
between necessary party, proper
party and pro forma party and
further held that if a person
while reiterating the distinction between a
necessary party, proper party and pro forma party, the following was
observed:
"...38. In Public Service Commission ... wherein the Court has
explained the distinction between necessary party, proper
party and pro forma party and further held that if a person
grounds:
(i) Sh. Shrey Mittal and Sh. Tushaal Mittal were only
pro forma parties to the agreement;
(ii) They did not receive any consideration under ... Reshu Mittal. Sh. Shrey Mittal and Sh.
Tushaal Mittal were only pro forma parties. Moreover, Sh. Shrey
Mittal and Sh. Tushaal Mittal did not receive
