been dismissed.
2. Case of plaintiffs is that plaintiffs and proforma defendants No.2 to
10 are owners in possession of the suit property detailed ... share enjoyed by Nanak had also been inherited by plaintiffs and proforma
defendants No.2 to 10. It is further alleged that mortgagers could
well as the
proforma defendants for partition since the month of January, 2009. However, both the
principal defendants and the proforma defendants did not adhere ... proforma defendants though it was a categorical admitted case of
the plaintiff that the plaintiff as well as the principal defendants and the proforma
defendants
possessed by predecessor-
.
in-interest of plaintiffs as well as of proforma defendants
and after their death, plaintiff and proforma defendants are
in joint ownership ... Whether suit land had been owned and
possessed by the plaintiff/proforma defendants
or their predecessor-in-interest? OPP
2. Whether State
Rule 10, read with Section 151 CPC were impleaded as
proforma defendants and necessary amendment in
::: Downloaded on - 06/04/2026 ... passed in absence of such parties either
defendants or proforma defendants.
(6) That the applicant/appellant/plaintiff is not
claiming the share of Raj Kumar
framed the following issues on
8.12.1999: -
.
1. Whether the plaintiffs and proforma defendants are joint
owners in possession of the suit land? OPP.
2. Whether ... collusive, illegal and not affecting the
rights of the plaintiffs and proforma defendants as alleged?
OPP.
of
3. Whether the suit is not maintainable
respondents No.1 and
2/defendants No.1 & 2 (for short defendants No. 1 & 2) and
rt
proforma defendants ... conventional entries and against the rights of the
plaintiffs and proforma defendants. The aforesaid sale
deeds were executed without any legal necessity
That the predecessor-in-interest of the defendants and
thereafter the proforma defendants entered into various lease
deeds dated 26.05.2011, 27.05.2011, 31.03.2022 with the plaintiff ... Bali Ram, predecessor in interest of proforma
defendants No. 12 to 14, Sh. Subhash and Sh. Lal Chand
predecessor-in-interest of proforma defendants
Dhubri Town. After his death, his legal the defendant and proforma defendants had
been possessing the said land and standing houses on it making amicable ... perform the agreement on their part.
6. The defendant and proforma defendants contested the suit by filling joint written
statement and also submitted counter-claim
Norata Ram who was mother of plaintiff No.2 and
proforma defendants No.3 and 4. Subsequently, he also executed Will giving
three shops ... three shops to Dayal Kaur, mother of
plaintiff No.2 and proforma defendants No.3 and 4. One shop was kept by
him which
Devi to be the daughter of Aklu Teli. The plaintiffs and proforma
defendants in view of the genealogy had claimed themselves to be the heirs ... Kasira were being cultivated by the ancestors of
the plaintiffs and proforma defendants who were still living at village Kulabira
where the property situate
