Dated of Decision: 13.07.2017
ORDER
Facts:
1. The appellant filed RTI application dated 11.01.2016 seeking a copy of
the letter issued by the corporate office ... retired BSNL officials; along with details regarding disposal of his protest
application dated 20.07.2015.
2. The CPIO response is not on record. The appellant filed
other words, whether or not the duty is paid under protest once an application for refund is made in the requisite manner and form ... with such an application. Where there is an assessment order, the authority will take it into account in deciding the application for refund. If such
Order per: Madhu Mohan Damodhar]
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 20 days in filing the appeal is condoned ... clearances made during the aforesaid period under protest. Thereafter, the respondent preferred a refund application on 21-05-2014 claiming an amount
since April, 2010. This reversal was being made by them under protest, which is evident as they were contesting the issue before the appellate authority ... months. However, the Assistant Commissioner rejected the refund application, observing that the protest by the appellant seized after final verdict of the Tribunal
gate parking etc. were provided there. However, he took
the possession under protest and under the apprehension that the
opposite parties will provide complete basic ... took the
possession on 17.6.2014 under protest there being lack of basic
amenities at the site. On the application dated 13.10.2016 of the
opposite parties
only an
application was received from the complainant for reducing the
load from 231.175 KW to 109.920 KW. When the said application
was processed ... bills since 2012 without any protest. The Op is not
under obligation to reduce the load unless complete application is
submitted
through TR-6 challan in PLA under protest by the appellant. Thereafter, the appellant filed an application for refund of the said amount. The refund
conversion of the flat from lease hold to free hold on the application moved by the complainant. On 02.04.08 the complainant was shown a corrigendum ... cost. The complainant deposited Rs. 12534/- under protest on 18.08.08. His RTI application was not attended properly. He was informed that being a very
charges, alongwith a levy of 5% and the application filed by the Petitioner with the Respondent, protesting against the charging of interest
payment plan, and also no specific time period was mentioned in the application form, as such, time was not the essence of contract ... relating to "únder protest", they failed to do so. It was further stated that, Clause 8 of the application form, clearly says that
