NCERT Campus,
New Delhi -110016
Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:
RTI Application filed on : 23.08.2021
CPIO replied on : 16.09.2021
First Appeal filed ... Application dated 23.08.2021 seeking
information as under:
"Can the protest application of MANGI TEJESWARA RAO the key for
PRT recruitment test vide recruitment notification
Dated of Decision: 13.07.2017
ORDER
Facts:
1. The appellant filed RTI application dated 11.01.2016 seeking a copy of
the letter issued by the corporate office ... retired BSNL officials; along with details regarding disposal of his protest
application dated 20.07.2015.
2. The CPIO response is not on record. The appellant filed
passed by this Hon'ble
Commission, under protest, subject to the adjudication of Application seeking
modification and without prejudice to my constitutional and legal ... passed by this Hon'ble
Commission, under protest, subject to the adjudication of Application seeking
modification and without prejudice to my constitutional and legal
applied for regularisation
of this period. He did made an application under protest but this cannot be acted upon by the
Public Authority.
2. Suffice ... Commissioner
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against
application and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO
long as ten years. He has filed the present
RTI application to protest against his dismissal. It is explained to him that the matter
being ... Commissioner
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against
application and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO
Plan. This amounts to a fresh question since the
question in the application is clear and has been clearly answered. Similarly,
the questions asked with ... answered.
Appellant protested that the opinion of Law Department was wrong as
the first affidavit has been superseded by his subsequent application
case in brief is that the Complainant had sent an application on 9
June 2008 to the CPIO/Branch Manager seeking a number of information ... application was provided to him. The
Complainant, however, protested that since he had sent his application
through speed post, there was no reason
clarification be provided against my
application dated 6.2008."
In both, this and the other cases, the appellant has protested that "Appeal ... 2008/01493
In this case, Shri S. P. Goyal moved an application before the PMO on
19.2.08 seeking the following information:
"Please inform whether
described by CPIO Shri Ashok Kumar, in
his response to the RTI application is "beyond the jurisdiction and scope of the
duties of CPIO ... complaint of Shri Mahabir Singh of 15.4.08 is concerned,
protesting the transfer of the application, we find that it is only the part
your application it is seen that it is addressed
to the Central Information Commission but para 5 (a) of this
application clearly points ... Shri
Mohammed Haleem Khan, Secretary, CIC protesting that CPIO did not transfer
the appellant's said RTI application or any part thereof
