Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Deendayal vs Chief Administrator, Puda, Mohali. on 2 February, 2015
2nd Additional Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
DAKSHIN ... Golden Avenue, Phase I, Garha Road,
Jalandhar.
.....Complainants
Versus
1. Chief Administrator, PUDA, Mohali.
2. Estate Officer, PUDA, Jalandhar.
.....Opposite Parties
Consumer Complaint under
encashment by Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (hereinafter referred as PUDA) to the State Bank of India, Jalandhar, (hereinafter referred as SBI) through letter ... dated 18.4.1980 and 30.6.1980. This communication was followed by reminders from PUDA to the bank on several occasions from
Estate Officer, Puda Bathinda vs Chhinder Pal on 9 August, 2017
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,
CHANDIGARH.
First Appeal No.117 of 2017
Date ... Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, Bathinda
through its Estate Officer, PUDA Complex, Bhagu Road, Bathinda,
Tehsil and District Bathinda-151 001.
.......Appellant-Opposite Party
Puda vs Sanjiv Vashist on 13 January, 2016
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 390 OF 2013 (Against the Order dated ... 2012 in Appeal No. 650/2007 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. PUDA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR,
OPP TEHSIL COMPLEX, JALANDHAR PUNJAB ...........Petitioner(s) Versus
Kaur vs Puda on 19 April, 2011
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
PUNJAB, SCO NO.3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH
Misc.Application
PIARE LAL GARG, MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the appellants-PUDA (hereinafter
called 'the appellants') against the order dated ... pointed out the defects to the Estate Officer, PUDA,
who vide letter directed the SDO to remove these defects but nothing was
done. Thereafter
Jaswant Singh vs Puda on 21 October, 2011
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH
First Appeal No.1176 ... Ropar.
.....Appellant
Versus
1. Punjab Urban Development Authority through its Chief Administrator,
PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, SAS Nagar Mohali, District Mohali.
2. Sub Divisional Officer
Urban Estate
Kapurthala-144601 Petitioner
Versus
Punjab Urban & Development
Authority (PUDA)
Through Estate Officer
SCO 41, Ladowali Road
Jallandhar City (Pubjab) Respondent
Before :
HONBLE ... made two allegations against the respondent, Punjab Urban & Development
Authority (PUDA) before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
Jalandhar (the District Forum for short
Milakh Officer, Puda, vs Tarsem Lal Jain on 13 March, 2013
3rd Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH ... Date of Institution: 11.01.2010.
Date of Decision: 13.03.2013.
Milakh Officer, PUDA, Bathinda, District Bathinda (now Bathinda
Development Authority, Bhagu Road, Bathinda).
.....Appellant.
Versus
Tarsem
Puda vs Vidya Chetal on 16 September, 2019
Author: N.V. Ramana
Bench: Ajay Rastogi , Mohan M. Shantanagoudar , N.V. Ramana
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME
