Banmeet Singh Uppal vs Puda on 29 September, 2011
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,
DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH.
Consumer Complaint ... Sector 35-C,
Chandigarh.
....Complainant
Versus
1. PUDA, Mohali through its Estate Officer, Sector 62, PUDA Bhawan,
Mohali.
2. GMADA through its Addl. Chief Administrator
Bhanota vs Puda on 25 February, 2011
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,
SCO NOS.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.
First Appeal ... Urban Estate, Bathinda.
.....Appellant
Versus
1. Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (PUDA), PUDA
Complex, Mohali through its Chief Administrator.
2. Punjab Urban Planning
Puda vs Gagandeep Kaur on 31 March, 2011
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,
SCO NOS.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.
First Appeal ... Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority through its Chief
Administrator, PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, SAS Nagar (Mohali), Distt.
Ropar.
2. The Estate Officer, Punjab Urban
Gmada (Formerly Known As Puda), vs Rup Chand Bhardwaj on 23 August, 2011
2nd Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO.3009 ... Date of Institution: 21.05.2010.
Date of Decision: 23.08.2011.
GMADA (formerly known as PUDA), PUDA Bhawan, Mohali.
.....Appellant.
Versus
Rup Chand Bhardwaj
The Hindu Urban Cooperative Bank ... vs The State Information Commission And ... on 9 May, 2011
amount even
during the further extended period, the Chief
Administrator, PUDA vide order dated
01.03.2004/07.04.2004 (Annexure P5) cancelled its
allotment and refunded ... dealt with the case earlier in his capacity as Chief
Administrator, PUDA and put up the said revision
CWP No.13587 of 2007
charged till the possession is
handed over to the allotteees. In case PUDA fails to deliver the
possession of the plots within two years ... through post conveyed that certificate of possession has been prepared by
the PUDA on 9.1.2002 and directed the appellant to collect the same from
That in view of 73rd and 74th Amendment of the
Constitution, PUDA has no jurisdiction to do urban planning
within any area falling ... Constitution,
CWP No.7160 of 2006 (O&M) 3
neither PUDA nor the board constituted under Section 3 and 4
of Punjab Regional
further questioning they were told, that the colony
is approved by PUDA.
4. That Rachan Singh accused who is an agriculturist of
village Kardala told ... told that he has got the
colony approved from PUDA and showed the plan in
which plots were numbered.
6. That believing accused
further questioning they were told,
that the colony is approved by PUDA.
4. That Rachan Singh accused who is an agriculturist of
village Kardala told ... told that he has got the
colony approved from PUDA and showed the plan in
which plots were numbered.
6. That believing accused
