Kansal vs Puda & Anr on 7 February, 2011
Author: Surya Kant
Bench: Surya Kant
CWP No.4491 of 2010.doc -1-
HIGH COURT ... Date of Decision: 07.02.2011
****
Hem Raj Kansal . . . . Petitioner
VS.
PUDA & Anr. . . . . Respondents
****
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
****
1. Whether Reporters
amount even
during the further extended period, the Chief
Administrator, PUDA vide order dated
01.03.2004/07.04.2004 (Annexure P5) cancelled its
allotment and refunded ... dealt with the case earlier in his capacity as Chief
Administrator, PUDA and put up the said revision
CWP No.13587 of 2007
Additional Advocate General Punjab,
accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-authorities-PUDA.
In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass ... allotted the above stated plot by the PUDA. It is further averred that in its
8th Annual General Meeting (Annexure P-2), the Company decided
seeks quashing of the order dated
06.08.2008 (Annexure P25) passed by the PUDA
declining compounding of the offence under Section 38 (2)
of the Punjab
Chandigarh was taken on deputation by the
respondent Punjab Housing Board (now PUDA) on
deputation as General Manager on 11.02.1993. The
parent organization
Jagjit Singh -
respondent No.3 from the Punjab Urban
Development Authority (PUDA) vide sale deed
dated 26.03.2007 for a sale consideration of `8
lacs only ... 2009.doc -4-
(6). On the contrary, the government agency, namely,
PUDA sold the subject house to respondent No.3
for a sale consideration
