Puda Thr Chief Administrator vs Harsanjiv Kaur on 10 August, 2015
Bench: Ranjan Gogoi , N.V. Ramana
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.8 SECTION ... 2007 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH)
PUDA THR CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANR. PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
HARSANJIV KAUR
Puda vs Vidya Chetal on 16 September, 2019
Author: N.V. Ramana
Bench: Ajay Rastogi , Mohan M. Shantanagoudar , N.V. Ramana
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME
Puda vs Vidya Chetal on 9 July, 2019
Bench: N.V. Ramana , Mohan M. Shantanagoudar , Ajay Rastogi
ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII ... 2013 passed by the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, New Delhi)
PUDA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
VIDYA CHETAL Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 5237/2015
Puda vs Vidya Chetal on 10 July, 2019
Bench: N.V. Ramana , Mohan M. Shantanagoudar , Ajay Rastogi
ITEM NO.101(PH) COURT NO.3 SECTION ... 2013 passed by the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, New Delhi)
PUDA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
VIDYA CHETAL Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 5237/2015
Jalandhar Development Authority/Puda ... vs Amrik Singh on 17 July, 2017
Bench: N.V. Ramana , Prafulla C. Pant
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.10 SECTION ... National Consumers Disputes
Reddressal Commission, New Delhi)
JALANDHAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY/PUDA ESTATE OFFICERPetitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMRIK SINGH Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION
Puda Thr Chief Administrator vs Harsanjiv Kaur on 6 May, 2015
Bench: Ranjan Gogoi , N.V. Ramana
ITEM NO.15+23 COURT NO.8 SECTION ... 2007 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At
Chandigarh)
PUDA THR CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
HARSANJIV KAUR
Puda (Now) Greater Ludhiana Area ... vs Mandeep Singh on 26 February, 2016
Author: N.V. Ramana
Bench: N.V. Ramana
ITEM NO.42 COURT ... 2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at
Chandigarh)
PUDA (NOW) GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT (GLADA)Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MANDEEP SINGH
where-
is” basis, they cannot be heard to contend that PUDA had not provided the
basic amenities like parking, lights, roads, water, sewerage ... amenities like parking, lights, roads,
water, sewerage, etc. were not provided by PUDA when the plots were
allotted. Over and above, the facts would clearly
State of Punjab as well as the Punjab
Urban Areas Development Authority (PUDA) contending, inter alia, that the
application filed by the plaintiff ... earlier, was decreed and the first appeals
filed by the State and PUDA were also dismissed by the learned District
Judge by order dated
petitioner to
approach the concerned authorities of Punjab Urban
Development Authority (PUDA) for suitable relief and if
such a representation is filed, the concerned authorities
