Case and observed that prima facie the two revisionists committed offence of purgery. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to them purporting to be notice ... explain why they should not be punished for committing the offence of purgery. From such notice it is obvious that the Court below
also moved an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for purgery.
5. After these documents coming on record, the respondent was asked to produce ... into the facts and circumstance, the respondent need not be proceeded for purgery, although it is a clear case of purgery. The application
issued to the police authorities for registration of FIR.
No purgery or tampering of the documents has been committed by the
respondents before the Forum ... case. The deciding court has also to give findings about
the purgery or forgery committed by the person, against whom the complaint
can be lodged
issued to the police authorities for registration of FIR.
No purgery or tampering of the documents has been committed by the
respondents before the Forum ... case. The deciding court has also to give findings about
the purgery or forgery committed by the person, against whom the complaint
can be lodged
action in accordance with the law for
commission of the offence of purgery.
4. The plaintiff filed the replication to the Written Statement ... false statement and therefore,
she is liable for punishment for committing purgery.
It is claimed that:-
In her cross examination on 17.08.2004, the
plaintiff denied
false or incorrect he will be charged with the offence of purgery. As
such, the affidavit cannot be thrown away without declaring the statements made
judicial inherent
powers, order for initiation of criminal proceedings
due to purgery committed by Shri Ram Dev,
Defendant No.4 and Shri Arjun Dev, Defendant
suppression of material facts as well as deliberate mis-statement amounting to purgery.
6. Allahabad High Court Rules in Chapter XXII, Rules 7 provides that ... fact and is guilty of making incorrect statement on oath, amounting to purgery. The petitioner appears to be an officer holding a responsible post
award of the arbitrator was tainted with fraud, misrepresentation, cheating and purgery committed by the respondent and the learned Arbitrator despite having knowledge about
powers vested entirely in domain of judiciary. The Commissioner of Police committed purgery and falsification of records. He and other police officials indulged into corrupt
