only happen if her menstrual cycle was
restored. She used to consult quacks and Mantriks in order
to help.get a child. Accused ... spirit of an unmarried Brahmin boy.
Accused NOs. 1 and 2 consulted quacks who prescribed that
virgins should be offered as sacrifice to Munjaba
those two writ petitions, they had furnished a list
of the alleged quack Doctors in every District and a consolidated list of 2000
quacks ... first respondent
Association themselves made a definition as to who is quack so as to include
even the names of Doctors who are practicing over
argument, if it is seen without the past history of quack practising in the U.P., would seem to be eminently acceptable but the history ... quack practice hire has to be kept in mind before this argument is dealt with.
13. The whole thing started with the case
Ndps Act. (Ndps ... vs In Re: Dr. Babu Sarkar (Quack Doctor) @ ... on 4 July, 2022
04.07.2022
Sl. No.5
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. (NDPS ... NDPS Case No.28 of 2020)
And
In Re: Dr. Babu Sarkar (Quack Doctor) @ Babar Sarkar @ Babu Sarkar
... ... Petitioner
Mrs. Sonali Das
... ... for the petitioner
Asha Devi @ Quack @ Asha Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 27 May, 2015
Author: Anjana Prakash
Bench: Anjana Prakash
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Case No. -398 Year- 2013 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI (HAJIPUR)
======================================================
Asha Devi @ Quack @ Asha Singhm W/o Late Birendra Kumar Singh,
R/o Mohalla - Ramchaura
Asha Devi @ Quack @ Asha Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 13 April, 2015
Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh
Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH ... Case No. -398 Year- 2013 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
======================================================
Asha Devi @ Quack @ Asha Singh
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
Asha Devi @ Quack @ Asha Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 25 March, 2015
Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh
Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH ... Case No. -398 Year- 2013 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
======================================================
Asha Devi @ Quack @ Asha Singh
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance
Pritam Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 October, 2017
Bench: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan , Sharad
State Government specifically the Civil
Surgeons are not taking action against the quack doctors who have
no requisite qualifications. On 25.11.2004 a Division Bench ... State Government and submit a report
within two months about such quack doctors who have no
requisite qualifications and training and who are menace
dated 26.06.2020, it
was directed that if any other matter pertaining to quacks (Jholachhap
Doctors) is filed, the same shall be listed before Division Bench ... this Court directed that the anticipatory
bail applications filed by the Quacks (Jholachhap Doctors) and pending
before trial Courts shall be forwarded to this Court
