Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 October, 2011
Equivalent citations ... COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6823 OF 2010
RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD. -- APPELLANT
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. -- RESPONDENTS
WITH
CIVIL
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range ... on 22 January, 2008
Equivalent citations: [2008]299ITR175(DELHI), (2008)114TTJ(DELHI)1
ORDER
Vimal ... Delhi-V, New Delhi
Dated 9.3.07
The Principal Officer,
M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited,
12th Floor, Devika Towers,
6, Nehru Place,
New Delhi.
Sub: Show
Satish Khosla vs M/S Eli Lilly Ranbaxy Ltd. & Another on 12 December, 1997
Equivalent citations: 1998IAD(DELHI)927, 1(1998)CLT1
assessee
received `50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) from
Ranbaxy as non-competition fee. The said amount was
paid by Ranbaxy under an agreement ... part of Gufic Group. Assessee agreed to
transfer its trademarks to Ranbaxy and in consideration of
such transfer assessee agreed that it shall not carry
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 5 September, 2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
" D " BENCH, AHMEDABAD
BEFORE JUSTICE ... 2015
( नधा रण वष /Assess ment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. बनाम/ The DCIT
12 t h Floor, Devika Tower
Civil Appeal No.7148 of 2009.
3. On October 3, 2007 Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (respondent no.3),
a company incorporated and registered under the Indian ... respondent no.1 in Civil Appeal No.7148). The agreement provided for
Ranbaxy to purchase from Zenotech's promoters a large block of equity
Pharmaceutical The ACIT,
Industries Ltd.(Erstwhile Central Circle-1,
Ranbaxy Laboratories Vs Baroda
Ltd.), SPARC, Tandalja, (Respondent)
Vadodara-20
PAN: AAACR0127N
(Appellant ... Circle-2(1)(1), Pharmaceutical
Baroda Vs Industries
(Appellant) Ltd.(Erstwhile
Ranbaxy
Laboratories Ltd.),
SPARC, Tandalja,
Vadodara-20
PAN: AAACR0127N
(Respondent)
Revenue by: Shri Mohd
CETA 1985) and that in the case of M/s. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., the Tribunal had held that the goods were classifiable under Heading ... classifiable under Heading 29.36 as held in the case of M/s. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited or under Heading 23.02 as held in the case
labels. The main manufacturing activities was done by M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., Delhi to whom the assessee had paid processing charges ... manufacturing activity, rather it got the manufacturing activity done from M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. to whom processing charges had been paid. According
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs Dua Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. on 22 July, 1988
Equivalent citations: AIR1989DELHI44, 1988(2)ARBLR315(DELHI), 36(1988)DLT133, AIR 1989 DELHI
