Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Randi Vasudeva Rao, vs Boddu Veerraju, on 27 November, 2018 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4622

India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Randi Lachaya And Anr. on 12 April, 1994 Equivalent citations: (1995)ILLJ770ORI JUDGMENT S.C. Mohapatra, J. 1. This

Randi Srilekhya vs The State Of Ap on 28 July, 2021 Author: U.Durga Prasad Rao Bench: U.Durga Prasad Rao eo IN THE HIGH ... JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 12488 OF 2021 Between: Randi Srilekhya, D/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged about 21 years, BDS student

Randi Vasudeva Rao, vs Boddu Veerraju on 27 November, 2018 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4526

Shri.Pradeep S/O. Randi Mane vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 August, 2021 Author: S.R. Krishna Kumar Bench: S.R. Krishna Kumar

Randi Srilekhya vs The State Of Ap on 6 August, 2021 Author: U.Durga Prasad Rao Bench: U.Durga Prasad

Randi Atchuthbabu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 April, 2022 Author: R.Subramanian Bench: R.Subramanian , N.Sathish Kumar ... JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P(MD)No.19163 of 2021 Randi Atchuthbabu ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal

Sunil Kumara H M @ Randy vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 March, 2015 Author: A.V.Chandrashekara Bench: A.V.Chandrashekara ... CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.373/2015 BETWEEN: SUNIL KUMARA H M @ RANDY S/O LATE MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT GANDHINAGAR, HIRISAVE CHANNARAYAPATNA

Life Insurance Corporation Of India, vs Randi Mahalakshmi, on 16 October, 2025 Author: R Raghunandan Rao Bench: R Raghunandan ... 2025 Between: Life Insurance Corporation Of India, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Randi Mahalakshmi ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv vs Randy Raymond Malm....Opponent(S) on 28 April, 2015 Author: M.R. Shah Bench: M.R. Shah ... COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV,....Appellant(s) Versus RANDY RAYMOND MALM....Opponent(s) ========================================================== Appearance: MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE