Section 14 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
state of mind, such as intention, knowledge, good faith, negligence, rashness, ill-will or good-will towards any particular person, or showing the existence
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34271 (4.97 seconds)Rajendra Prasad Hansaria vs Praveen Jain on 19 July, 2012
negligence differs in civil and
criminal law. What may be negligence in civil law may not
necessarily be negligence in criminal law. For negligence ... always been
that in the case of medical negligence or rashness, mere rashness or
negligence, on the part of a medical practitioner, would not attract
Marwari Maternity Hospital And Ors vs Sri Praveen Jain on 19 July, 2012
negligence differs in civil and
criminal law. What may be negligence in civil law may not
necessarily be negligence in criminal law. For negligence ... always been
that in the case of medical negligence or rashness, mere rashness or
negligence, on the part of a medical practitioner, would not attract
Dr.Gurdeep Singh Kochhar And Another vs U.T. Chandigarh And Another on 3 February, 2010
negligence differs in
civil and criminal law. What may be negligence in civil
law may not necessarily be negligence in criminal law.
For negligence ... amount
to criminal negligence, the degree of negligence should
be much higher i.e. Gross or of a very high degree.
Negligence which is neither
Thomas @ Sanni vs State Of Kerala on 7 January, 2015
rashness and negligence of a driver which
caused the accident is not a fact that could be proved
by the testimony of the eye witnesses ... gives a clear picture of the
scene of occurrence and gross negligence and
rashness of the driver of the vehicle are seen apparent
Sani Devi Wife Of Late Ranjeet Nagesia vs Purushottam Singh Son Of Anirudh Singh on 28 June, 2022
that even if there is no negligence, default or
rash act or even if rashness, negligence or wrongful act is not proved,
claimants are entitled ... others, must be driven rashly and negligently. This is the
logical inference which can be drawn. Rashness and negligence has got
nothing to do with
Sanjit Chaubey vs The State Nct Of Delhi on 24 February, 2024
terms, 'rashness' and 'negligence', observed as under;
"7. ...Negligence and rashness are essential
elements under Section 304-A. Culpable negligence ... hold that a driver is
rash or negligent. Speed alone is not the criterion for
deciding rashness or negligence on the part of the
driver
Bijender Kumar vs State on 27 March, 2024
terms, 'rashness'
and 'negligence', observed as under;
"7. ...Negligence and rashness are essential
elements under Section 304-A . Culpable negligence ... motorcyclist was
driving his motorcycle in a rash and negligent manner. Due to
his rash and negligence driving he fell down on the road
Gulab Singh Chauhan vs State on 28 August, 2025
high speed" without quantifiable
evidence or proof of rashness/negligence is insufficient for conviction, and the
trial court's reliance on photographs ... hold that a driver is rash or negligent. Speed alone is not the criterion for
deciding rashness or negligence on the part of the driver
State vs Ishrar on 24 January, 2025
Israr Page No.11 of 27
(ii) That due to the rashness/ negligence of the accused the
incident actually took place.
(iii) Grievous hurt ... hold that a driver is
rash or negligent. Speed alone is not the criterion for
deciding the rashness or negligence on the part