removal of encroachment from the
said common passage/Rasta and ultimately he had filed a Misc.
Case No.892 of 2006, before the Sub-Divisional ... submitted a report dated 24.06.2006, mentioning about
existence of Rasta/passage, however, the said case remained
undecided, leading to the petitioner filing a writ petition
putting pressure
she files criminal cases. On earlier occasion also, case of similar
nature was filed bearing Case No.3570(C) of 2007 leveling almost ... opposite party no.2. Prior to this case a complaint case was also filed
numbered as Case No.3570(C) of 2007 by Jagdish Choudhary
have got no rasta towards south. High Court has
not decided any such rasta in any case. Further plot no.2986 is of the
defendants ... proving their case by the defendants.
The plaintiffs will stand or fall on their case as the plaintiffs have to
prove their case then they
plot no. 120 were wrongly recorded as
Rasta in course of consolidation proceeding. It is further case of the
petitioner that in course of consolidation ... disputed area is being used by the villagers as Rasta rather it is an
admitted case of the parties that the Rasta was existing
party defendant in the suit. It is the case of the
petitioner that there is public Rasta in plot no. 1479 wherein the door ... easementary right to use the suit land as Rasta and
this right would be defeated in case of success of the plaintiff in the
suit
objection has been raised for using the parti land as Rasta.
Further case is that the matter was reported to the police but the police ... took
place on 19.03.1993 and it is the case that the police did not lodge the case and
impressed that they will come to inquire
respect
to plot no.1103 that it is a Rasta when it is admitted case of the
parties that there is a house standing over ... third case that the said plot was a rasta, which
was not the case of any of the parties nor was proved by any material
PATNA
Criminal Revision No.307 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)
===========================================================
Ram Pyare Mistri ... Divisional Magistrate Hilsa on the ground that it was
not public Rasta in case no. 88/MP/92 Trial No. 44/1999, without
hearing
article was published in the Naya Rasta under the caption "Naya Rasta ke sampadak jamanat per chore gaya" with different sub-heads ... undesirable activities the "Naya Rasta" alone had been victimised. The order sheet of G. R. Case No. 746 of 1958, State v. Shankar
also alleged that as there was old enmity with regard to Rasta, the occurrence took place.
3. On the same ... Rasta and as such the informant was inimical with the appellants from before and that all the prosecution witnesses examined in the case are relatives
