said application, the petitioners raised
objection as to maintainability of regular darkhast No.38 of 2006 with
contention that the respondents could have got restored ... regular
darkhast No.70 of 2001 which was dismissed in default. In order to avoid
the controversy, the learned counsel for the respondents made
before the Trial Court. The
Respondent subsequently filed execution proceeding being Regular
Darkhast No. 108 of 2017before the Ld. Civil Judge Senior Division,
Pune ... seeking the
stay to said execution proceeding being Regular Darkhast No.
108/2017 as pending before the Ld. 7th Civil Judge Senior Division,
Pune
Office is situate.
Already the execution proceedings, bearing Regular Darkhast No.61 of
2007, are filed, in which the order of removing the existing structure ... Respondent
No.1 was constrained to file the execution proceedings, bearing Regular
Darkhast No.61 of 2007. The Bailiff's Report shows that, though
accordingly."
6. The plaintiff sought to execute the decree in
Regular Darkhast 7/2016 which is rejected by the order
impugned dated ... 2018 02:15:11 :::
4 wp7183.17
11. Regular Darkhast 7/2016 is restored to file. The
Executing Court is directed to dispose
learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Warora below Exh.76 in Regular Darkhast No.39 of 1984. By
the impugned order, the Court below ... obtain fruits of the decree, plaintiff no.1 -
Meerabai lodged Regular Darkhast in the year 1984 and it was
::: Uploaded on - 21/09/2018 ::: Downloaded
their status in the trial court.
4. The Respondents had filed Regular Civil Suit No. 114
of 1998 in the Court of Civil Judge ... encroachers, including that of Arjun Mane. The
plaintiffs herein filed Regular Darkhast No. 7 of 1978 for vacant
possession of their half part
decree holders filed Darkhast Application 290 of
2012 to execute the decree in Regular Civil Suit 105 of 2002.
Record reveals that warrant of possession ... passed by the 7th Joint Civil
Judge, Junior Division, Akola in Regular Darkhast 290 of 2012
and the judgment and decree dated 28.4.2017 in Regular
three different Banks and by depositing
Rs.3394=77 in Regular Darkhast No.27/1991 pending before
the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Shrigonda in execution
passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.2,
Mumbai in Regular Darkhast No.518 of 2017. In that order, the learned
trial Judge recorded
decree holders, had filed a civil
suit being Regular Civil Suit No. 107 of 2002 against the petitioner
(original judgment-debtor no. 2) and respondent ... Supreme Court.
7. The respondents, on 27.4.2005, initiated execution
proceedings being Regular Darkhast No. 94 of 2005 as the decree was not
obeyed
