Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Ausa, District Latur/executing court in Regular Darkhast
::: Uploaded on - 28/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2020 ... aside the order dated 04.07.2012 passed below Exhibit 178 in
Regular Darkhast No.18 of 1981 and to dismiss the said application
and also
Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Ausa, District Latur/executing court in Regular Darkhast
::: Uploaded on - 28/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2020 ... aside the order dated 04.07.2012 passed below Exhibit 178 in
Regular Darkhast No.18 of 1981 and to dismiss the said application
and also
Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Ausa, District Latur/executing court in Regular Darkhast
::: Uploaded on - 28/04/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2020 ... aside the order dated 04.07.2012 passed below Exhibit 178 in
Regular Darkhast No.18 of 1981 and to dismiss the said application
and also
passed by
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner below Exhibit 47 in
Regular Darkhast No. 358 of 2012 (old No.50 of 2001), the
petitioners-original ... dated
10.01.2001, the petitioners had filed Regular Darkhast No. 358 of
2012 (old R.D. No. 50 of 2001) on 25.10.2001. In the pending
Darkhast
dismissed by the Supreme
Court.
(d) The appellant-plaintiff had filed Regular Darkhast No.2 of
2015 for execution of decree before the Civil Judge ... Taloda,
by judgment and order dated 08.02.2018 below Exhibit-40 in
Regular Darkhast No.2 of 2015 rejected the application.
::: Uploaded on - 30/04/2020
Civil Judge,
Junior Division, Bhusawal, below Exh.41 and 72 in Regular Darkhast
No. 4 of 1989.
2. Brief facts giving rise to the present ... impugned order dated 24.09.1999 passed below
Exh.41 and 72, in Regular Darkhast No. 4 of 1989, the learned Judge
of the executing Court sustained
Order XXI r/w
Section 47 of C.P.C. in Regular Darkhast No. 89 of 1998 stating
therein that the decree is not executable ... below Exhibit 37 and the order passed
below Exhibit 1 in Regular Darkhast No. 89 of 1998 alongwith the
::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2020 ::: Downloaded
Darkhast No.3 of 2000. Pending the Darkhast,
petitioners/third party had filed an application Exhibit
42 for staying the further proceedings in the Darkhast ... prayer
clause 'C' and, thereby the further proceedings in
Regular Darkhast No.3 of 2000 are stayed. Said Regular
Darkhast
passed by the executing court on
25.09.2003 below Exhibit 31 in Regular Darkhast No. 23 of 2000.
::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2020 ::: Downloaded ... such, the
execution and operation of the aforesaid order passed Regular
Darkhast No. 23 of 2000 below Exhibit 31 is stayed.
3. After lapse
learned Civil Judge, J.D., Bhiwandi below Exh.41
in Regular Darkhast No.92 of 2012 by which the learned Judge was pleased
to reject ... After dismissal of the second appeal, the respondents (original
plaintiffs) filed Regular Darkhast ( i.e. Regular Darkhast No.92 of 2012) for
execution
