Purshottam Kolharkar and Anr.)
(ii) Undisputedly, the petitioner was a daily wager. The daily wagers have no right to the post in view of ( Himanshu ... service of an employee. The position of daily wager is entirely different inasmuch the daily wager holds no post in view
regularisation cannot be passed,
also does not deserve acceptance as the respondents have
prepared separate gradation lists for four categories,
namely, daily wagers of technical
State
Government is obliged to create posts for regularisation of the services of daily wagers etc. from the
date of completion of 5 years service ... Division Bench for considering
the cases of all daily wagers and like for regularisation who completed 5 years on 19.8.1998 i.e. the
date
regularisation cannot be passed,
also does not deserve acceptance as the respondents have
prepared separate gradation lists for four categories,
namely, daily wagers of technical
regularisation cannot be passed,
also does not deserve acceptance as the respondents have
prepared separate gradation lists for four categories,
namely, daily wagers of technical
regularisation cannot be passed,
also does not deserve acceptance as the respondents have
prepared separate gradation lists for four categories,
namely, daily wagers of technical
Special Appeal is whether for consideration of the cases of daily wagers for regularisation of their services, the condition set out in Rule ... Supreme Court held that there was no right vested in daily wagers to seek regularisation and that regularisation can be done only in accordance with
Pati Ram is not found eligible for
regularisation/equal pay and the benefits of U.P.
Daily Wager Appointment Rules 2001 Group-D
cannot ... Court which directed the
State to frame a scheme for regularisation of such
daily wagers. In pursuance thereof, the
Government enacted U.P. Regularisation
case supra holds the field on the subject of Daily
Wager, casual employees, ad hoc Employees and
contract Employees. Therefore State as a model
Employer ... that
case, it is clear that the question of
regularisation of daily wager
appointed contrary to law does not
arise. This ratio of the judgment
regularisation cannot be passed,
also does not deserve acceptance as the respondents have
prepared separate gradation lists for four categories,
namely, daily wagers of technical
