Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 347 (1.63 seconds)

Rama Natarajan vs Alexander Xavier Nathan on 3 March, 1999

trauma which frustrated her relationship with him more so because of relative impotency towards the petitioner. The petitioner thought that the physical and psychological debilities ... response to the same thereby acquiescing the statements made regarding the relative impotency and non-consummation of the marriage with him. There is no collusion
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thamilarasi vs R. Velumurugan on 19 July, 1995

certain alleged disorders in the health of the respondent, particularly in relation to her vaginal canal. Now, the amendment sought for is for adding mainly ... contend that simply because, earlier the petitioner was characterised as impotent in relation to the respondent, it does not mean that she is incapable
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T. Rangaswami vs T. Aravindammal on 10 August, 1956

powers with respect to other persons. On principal, therefore, relative and not absolute Impotency would seem to be sufficient.....": Vandonberg v. Vandonberg ... regard to proof of impotency, the rules of evidence are not different in the case of impotency than elsewhere. Impotency that is physical unfit-ness
Madras High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Karthick vs Rajeshwari

respondent has falsely accused him as impotent and thereby lowered the image of the respondent amongst their relatives; that the petitioner demanded the respondent ... petitioner has falsely accused him as impotent and thereby lowered the image of the respondent amongst their relatives. 12.Except the allegations raised
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next